Retrospective assessment of radiation exposure using biological dosimetry: chromosome painting, electron paramagnetic resonance and the glycophorin a mutation assay
- PMID: 16808614
- DOI: 10.1667/RR3273.1
Retrospective assessment of radiation exposure using biological dosimetry: chromosome painting, electron paramagnetic resonance and the glycophorin a mutation assay
Abstract
Biological monitoring of dose can contribute important, independent estimates of cumulative radiation exposure in epidemiological studies, especially in studies in which the physical dosimetry is lacking. Three biodosimeters that have been used in epidemiological studies to estimate past radiation exposure from external sources will be highlighted: chromosome painting or FISH (fluorescence in situ hybridization), the glycophorin A somatic mutation assay (GPA), and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) with teeth. All three biodosimeters have been applied to A-bomb survivors, Chernobyl clean-up workers, and radiation workers. Each biodosimeter has unique advantages and limitations depending upon the level and type of radiation exposure. Chromosome painting has been the most widely applied biodosimeter in epidemiological studies of past radiation exposure, and results of these studies provide evidence that dose-related translocations persist for decades. EPR tooth dosimetry has been used to validate dose models of acute and chronic radiation exposure, although the present requirement of extracted teeth has been a disadvantage. GPA has been correlated with physically based radiation dose after high-dose, acute exposures but not after low-dose, chronic exposures. Interindividual variability appears to be a limitation for both chromosome painting and GPA. Both of these techniques can be used to estimate the level of past radiation exposure to a population, whereas EPR can provide individual dose estimates of past exposure. This paper will review each of these three biodosimeters and compare their application in selected epidemiological studies.
Similar articles
-
Usefulness and limits of biological dosimetry based on cytogenetic methods.Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;115(1-4):448-54. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nci061. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005. PMID: 16381765 Review.
-
A comprehensive dose reconstruction methodology for former rocketdyne/atomics international radiation workers.Health Phys. 2006 May;90(5):409-30. doi: 10.1097/01.HP.0000183763.02247.7e. Health Phys. 2006. PMID: 16607174
-
Dose reconstruction for therapeutic and diagnostic radiation exposures: use in epidemiological studies.Radiat Res. 2006 Jul;166(1 Pt 2):141-57. doi: 10.1667/RR3525.1. Radiat Res. 2006. PMID: 16808603
-
Variability of parameters in retrospective EPR dosimetry with teeth for Ukrainian population.Appl Radiat Isot. 2005 Feb;62(2):201-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2004.08.043. Appl Radiat Isot. 2005. PMID: 15607449
-
In vivo EPR dosimetry to quantify exposures to clinically significant doses of ionising radiation.Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2006;120(1-4):163-70. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nci554. Epub 2006 Apr 27. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2006. PMID: 16644994 Review.
Cited by
-
A novel method for biodosimetry.Radiat Environ Biophys. 2007 Jun;46(2):147-54. doi: 10.1007/s00411-006-0072-1. Epub 2006 Oct 27. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2007. PMID: 17072633
-
Individual radiosensitivity and its relevance to health physics.Dose Response. 2007 Nov 23;5(4):333-48. doi: 10.2203/dose-response.07-022.Schnarr. Dose Response. 2007. PMID: 18648561 Free PMC article.
-
Current status of biodosimetry based on standard cytogenetic methods.Radiat Environ Biophys. 2010 Nov;49(4):567-81. doi: 10.1007/s00411-010-0311-3. Epub 2010 Jul 9. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2010. PMID: 20617329 Review.
-
Gene expression-based dosimetry by dose and time in mice following acute radiation exposure.PLoS One. 2013 Dec 16;8(12):e83390. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083390. eCollection 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 24358280 Free PMC article.
-
Use of the γ-H2AX assay to monitor DNA damage and repair in translational cancer research.Cancer Lett. 2012 Dec 31;327(1-2):123-33. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2011.12.025. Epub 2011 Dec 21. Cancer Lett. 2012. PMID: 22198208 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous