A clinician-educator's roadmap to choosing and interpreting statistical tests
- PMID: 16808753
- PMCID: PMC1924630
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00390.x
A clinician-educator's roadmap to choosing and interpreting statistical tests
Erratum in
- J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Sep;21(9):1009
Abstract
As educators seek confirmation of successful trainee achievement, medical education must move toward a more evidence-based approach to teaching and evaluation. Although medical training often provides physicians with a general background in biostatistics, many are not prepared to apply these skills. This can hinder clinician educators as they wish to develop, analyze and disseminate their scholarly work. This paper is intended to be a concise educational tool and guide for choosing and interpreting statistical tests aimed toward medical education assessment. It includes guidelines and examples that clinician-educators can use when analyzing and interpreting studies and when writing methods and results sections of reports.
References
-
- Liaison Committee on Medical Education. 2005. Available at: http://www.lcme.org.
-
- Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Outcome Project. General Competencies: minimum program requirements language. 2005. Available at http://www.acgme.org/outcome/comp/compMin.aspAccessed December 1.
-
- Chen FM, Bauchner H, Burstin H. A call for outcomes research in medical education. Acad Med. 2004;79:955–60. - PubMed
-
- Dauphinee WD, Wood-Dauphinee S. The need for evidence in medical education: the development of best evidence medical education as an opportunity to inform, guide, and sustain medical education research. Acad Med. 2004;79:925–30. - PubMed
-
- Berwick DM, Fineberg HV, Weinsteing MC. When doctors meet numbers. Am J Med. 1981;71:991–8. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials