The impact of state laws limiting malpractice damage awards on health care expenditures
- PMID: 16809580
- PMCID: PMC1522105
- DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.077883
The impact of state laws limiting malpractice damage awards on health care expenditures
Abstract
Twenty-eight states have laws that limit payments in malpractice cases, and several studies indicate that these laws reduce the frequency and severity of malpractice claims and lower premiums. Moreover, proponents believe that such laws reduce health care expenditures by reducing the practice of defensive medicine. However, there is a dearth of empirical evidence about the impact of these laws on the cost of health care. We used multivariate models and relatively recent data to estimate the impact of state tort reform laws that directly limit malpractice damage payments on health care expenditures. Estimates from these models suggest that laws limiting malpractice payments lower state health care expenditures by between 3% and 4%.
References
-
- Anderson RE. Billions for defense: the pervasive nature of defensive medicine. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159: 2399–2402. - PubMed
-
- Mello MM, Studdert DM, Brennan TA. The new medical malpractice crisis. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2281–2284. - PubMed
-
- Localio AR, Lawthers AG, Brennan TA, Laird NM, Hebert LE, Peterson LM, et al. Relation between malpractice claims and adverse events due to negligence. N Eng J Med. 1991; 325: 245–251. - PubMed
-
- Brennan TL, Leape L, Laird N, et al. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients: results from the Harvard Medical Practice study I. N Engl J Med. 1991;321: 480–484. - PubMed
-
- Defensive Medicine and Medical Malpractice. Washington DC: US Congress, Office of Technology Assessment; 1994. OTA-H-602.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
