Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2006 Aug;96(8):1359-63.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.069617. Epub 2006 Jun 29.

Effect of increased social unacceptability of cigarette smoking on reduction in cigarette consumption

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Effect of increased social unacceptability of cigarette smoking on reduction in cigarette consumption

Benjamin Alamar et al. Am J Public Health. 2006 Aug.

Abstract

Taxes on cigarettes have long been used to help reduce cigarette consumption. Social factors also affect cigarette consumption, but this impact has not been quantified. We computed a social unacceptability index based on individuals' responses to questions regarding locations where smoking should be allowed. A regression analysis showed that the social unacceptability index and price had similar elasticities and that their effects were independent of each other. If, through an active tobacco control campaign, the average individual's views on the social unacceptability of smoking changed to more closely resemble the views of California residents, there would be a 15% drop in cigarette consumption, equivalent to a 1.17 dollars increase in the excise tax on cigarettes.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Baltagi BH, Levin D. Estimating dynamic demand for cigarettes using panel data: the effects of bootlegging, taxation and advertising reconsidered. Rev Economics Stat. 1986;68:148–155.
    1. Chaloupka F. Rational addictive behavior and cigarette smoking. J Political Economy. 1991;99:722–742.
    1. Yen ST, Jones AM. Individual cigarette consumption and addiction: a flexible limited dependent variable approach. Health Economics. 1996;5: 105–117. - PubMed
    1. Fichtenberg CM, Glantz SA. Effect of smoke-free workplaces on smoking behavior: systematic review. BMJ. 2002;325:188–191. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Evans WN, Farrelly MC, Montgomery E. Do workplace smoking bans reduce smoking? Am Econ Rev. 1999; 89:728–747.