Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Mar;1(1):51-66.
doi: 10.1525/jer.2006.1.1.51.

Scientists' perceptions of organizational justice and self-reported misbehaviors

Brian C Martinson  1 , Melissa S Anderson, A Lauren Crain, Raymond de Vries
Affiliations

Scientists' perceptions of organizational justice and self-reported misbehaviors

Brian C Martinson et al. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2006 Mar.

Abstract

Policymakers concerned about maintaining the integrity of science have recently expanded their attention from a focus on misbehaving individuals to characteristics of the environments in which scientists work. Little empirical evidence exists about the role of organizational justice in promoting or hindering scientific integrity. Our findings indicate that when scientists believe they are being treated unfairly they are more likely to behave in ways that compromise the integrity of science. Perceived violations of distributive and procedural justice were positively associated with self-reports of misbehavior among scientists.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1
FIG. 1
Predicted probability of top 10 misbehavior by career stage and distributive injustice.
FIG. 2
FIG. 2
Predicted probability of top 10 misbehavior by procedural injustice, intrinsic drive and career stage.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. dams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267–299). New York: Academic Press.
    1. Agnew R. A revised strain theory of delinquency. Social Forces. 1985;64:151–167.
    1. Agnew R. Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology. 1992;30(1):47–87.
    1. gnew, R. (1995a). The contribution of social-psychological strain theory to the explanation of crime and delinquency. In F. Adler & W. Laufer (Eds.), The legacy of anomie theory (pp. 113–137). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
    1. Agnew R. Testing the leading crime theories: An alternative strategy focusing on motivational processes. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency. 1995b;32(4):363–398.

LinkOut - more resources