The effects of punishment intensity on squirrel monkeys
- PMID: 16811311
- PMCID: PMC1338325
- DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-95
The effects of punishment intensity on squirrel monkeys
Abstract
Responses of squirrel monkeys were maintained by a variable-interval schedule of food reinforcement. Concurrently, punishment consisting of a brief electric shock followed each response. As has been found for pigeons and rats, punishment did not produce extreme, all-or-none reactions. By gradually increasing the punishment intensity it was possible to produce response rates intermediate to no suppression and complete suppression. Similarly, the moment-to-moment response rate was free of extreme fluctuations. A "warm-up" effect occurred in which the punished responses were especially suppressed during the initial part of a session. The pre-punishment performance was negatively accelerated within a session, and punishment reduced the degree of negative acceleration. When punishment was discontinued, responding recovered immediately except when suppression had been complete or prolonged. When the punishment intensity was decreased gradually, more suppression resulted at a given intensity than when intensity was increased gradually. This suggests a "behavioral inertia" effect wherein behavior at a new punishment intensity is biased toward the behavior at the previous value. A corollary generalization is that the larger the change in intensity, the less the behavior at the new value will be biased toward the behavior at the previous value.
Similar articles
-
The effect of punishment shock intensity upon responding under multiple schedules.J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Sep;14(2):201-11. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.14-201. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970. PMID: 16811468 Free PMC article.
-
Generalization of behavioral history across responses in the reversal of the effects of cocaine and d-amphetamine on the punished behavior of squirrel monkeys.Behav Pharmacol. 1993 Feb;4(1):61-68. Behav Pharmacol. 1993. PMID: 11224172
-
Shock avoidance but not DRL history reverses the effects of cocaine on punished behavior of squirrel monkeys.Behav Pharmacol. 1993 Apr;4(2):159-166. Behav Pharmacol. 1993. PMID: 11224182
-
Punishment of responding under schedules of stimulus-shock termination: effects of d-amphetamine and pentobarbital.J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Sep;26(2):281-7. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.26-281. J Exp Anal Behav. 1976. PMID: 823288 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of methaqualone on punished and nonpunished behavior.J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1981 Jul;218(1):1-6. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1981. PMID: 7241372
Cited by
-
Patterns of responding within sessions.J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Jul;58(1):19-36. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.58-19. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992. PMID: 1645100 Free PMC article.
-
Punishment: the interactive effects of delay and intensity of shock.J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Nov;11(6):789-99. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-789. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968. PMID: 16811324 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of punishment shock intensity upon responding under multiple schedules.J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Sep;14(2):201-11. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.14-201. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970. PMID: 16811468 Free PMC article.
-
Discriminated punishment: avoidable and unavoidable shock.J Exp Anal Behav. 1967 Sep;10(5):451-60. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-451. J Exp Anal Behav. 1967. PMID: 6050057 Free PMC article.
-
Fixed-interval punishment.J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Nov;11(6):803-8. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-803. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968. PMID: 16811326 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials