Differential reinforcement of other behavior (DRO): a yoked-control comparison
- PMID: 16811508
- PMCID: PMC1333808
- DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1971.15-237
Differential reinforcement of other behavior (DRO): a yoked-control comparison
Abstract
After training to press a lever on a variable-interval 30-sec schedule, one group of rats was shifted to a differential-reinforcement-of-other-behavior 10-sec schedule, while a second group was shifted to a noncontingent yoked-control schedule that provided the same frequency and distribution of reinforcement. Then, both groups were extensively retrained on the variable-interval schedule, after which the first group was shifted to a series of differential-reinforcement-of-other-behavior 30-sec sessions alternating daily with variable-interval 30-sec sessions, while the second group was treated like the first on variable-interval days and yoked with the first as before on differential-reinforcement-of-other-behavior days. In both phases, response-decrement was more rapid and more marked in the differential-reinforcement-of-other-behavior animals than in the controls. The difference was due, at least in large measure, to sustainment of response in the control animals by adventitious reinforcement. All the differential-reinforcement-of-other-behavior animals developed "other" behavior-the same distinctive pattern of waiting at the foodcup-but there was no direct evidence that it contributed in any way to the decrement in lever pressing.
Similar articles
-
Adventitious reinforcement during long-duration DRO exposure.J Appl Behav Anal. 2020 Jul;53(3):1674-1687. doi: 10.1002/jaba.697. Epub 2020 Mar 6. J Appl Behav Anal. 2020. PMID: 32142174
-
The role of adventitious reinforcement during differential reinforcement of other behavior: A systematic replication.J Appl Behav Anal. 2020 Sep;53(4):2440-2449. doi: 10.1002/jaba.678. Epub 2020 Jan 16. J Appl Behav Anal. 2020. PMID: 31950501
-
Does DRO type matter?: Cycle versus resetting contingencies in eliminating responding.Behav Processes. 2020 Dec;181:104257. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2020.104257. Epub 2020 Sep 28. Behav Processes. 2020. PMID: 33002565
-
Reinforcement loss and behavioral tolerance to d-amphetamine: using percentile schedules to control reinforcement density.Behav Pharmacol. 1992 Dec;3(6):535-544. Behav Pharmacol. 1992. PMID: 11224155
-
Schedule-induced defecation by rats during ratio and interval schedules of food reinforcement.J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Nov;60(3):611-20. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-611. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993. PMID: 8283152 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Elimination of reinforced behavior: intermittent schedules of not-responding.J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Jan;27(1):23-32. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-23. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977. PMID: 16811979 Free PMC article.
-
Signalled reinforcement in differential-reinforcement-of-low rate schedules.J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Sep;22(2):381-90. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-381. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974. PMID: 16811801 Free PMC article.
-
A review of reinforcement control procedures.J Appl Behav Anal. 2005 Summer;38(2):257-78. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2005.176-03. J Appl Behav Anal. 2005. PMID: 16033174 Free PMC article. Review.
-
On habits and addiction: An associative analysis of compulsive drug seeking.Drug Discov Today Dis Models. 2008 Winter;5(4):235-245. doi: 10.1016/j.ddmod.2009.07.004. Drug Discov Today Dis Models. 2008. PMID: 20582332 Free PMC article.
-
Increased expression of 5-HT₆ receptors in dorsolateral striatum decreases habitual lever pressing, but does not affect learning acquisition of simple operant tasks in rats.Eur J Neurosci. 2011 Jul;34(2):343-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07756.x. Epub 2011 Jun 30. Eur J Neurosci. 2011. PMID: 21714816 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources