Effects of random reinforcement sequences
- PMID: 16811795
- PMCID: PMC1333271
- DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-301
Effects of random reinforcement sequences
Abstract
Rats were exposed to a random sequence of reinforcement on two levers, such that there was no way to predict from the previous reinforcement which lever would deliver reinforcement next. The rats showed a tendency to repeat the choice that had just produced reinforcement, despite the absence of an overall contingency that differentially reinforced such repetition. However, this tendency decreased with continued exposure to the schedule. Runs of successive reinforcements on a lever increased the probability of pressing that lever, but only slightly, and only in the earlier phases of training. The more quickly a press was made after reinforcement the more likely it was to be on the lever that had delivered that reinforcement. Repetition of choice followed by reinforcement should be viewed as a naturally occurring behavior in the rat, but not necessarily as a behavior that will continue without differential reinforcement of repetition.
Similar articles
-
Intercurrent and reinforced behavior under multiple spaced-responding schedules.J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 May;21(3):445-54. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-445. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974. PMID: 16811756 Free PMC article.
-
A runs-test algorithm: contingent reinforcement and response run structures.J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 Jan;93(1):61-80. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2010.93-61. J Exp Anal Behav. 2010. PMID: 20676268 Free PMC article.
-
Gestational exposure to methylmercury retards choice in transition in aging rats.Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2004 Mar-Apr;26(2):179-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2003.12.004. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2004. PMID: 15019952
-
Inactivation of dorsolateral striatum enhances sensitivity to changes in the action-outcome contingency in instrumental conditioning.Behav Brain Res. 2006 Jan 30;166(2):189-96. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2005.07.012. Epub 2005 Sep 8. Behav Brain Res. 2006. PMID: 16153716
-
Response acquisition under targeted percentile schedules: a continuing quandary for molar models of operant behavior.J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Jul;60(1):171-84. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-171. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993. PMID: 8354966 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Optimal choice.J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 May;35(3):397-412. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1981.35-397. J Exp Anal Behav. 1981. PMID: 16812224 Free PMC article.
-
Choice as a function of local versus molar reinforcement contingencies.J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Nov;56(3):455-73. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.56-455. J Exp Anal Behav. 1991. PMID: 1774539 Free PMC article.
-
Response repetition in pigeons: pharmacological and behavioral specificity.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1986;90(4):475-81. doi: 10.1007/BF00174064. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1986. PMID: 3101104
-
Choice behavior in transition: development of preference for the higher probability of reinforcement.J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 May;53(3):409-22. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-409. J Exp Anal Behav. 1990. PMID: 2341823 Free PMC article.
-
Short-term memory in the pigeon: the previously reinforced response.J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Nov;26(3):487-93. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.26-487. J Exp Anal Behav. 1976. PMID: 16811963 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources