Differential autoshaping to common and distinctive elements of positive and negative discriminative stimuli
- PMID: 16811812
- PMCID: PMC1333297
- DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-491
Differential autoshaping to common and distinctive elements of positive and negative discriminative stimuli
Abstract
The learning by hungry pigeons of a discrimination between two successively presented compound visual stimuli was investigated using a two-key autoshaping procedure. Common and distinctive stimulus elements were simultaneously presented on separate keys and either followed by food delivery, S+, or not, S-. The subjects acquired both between-trial and within-trial discriminations. On S+ trials, pigeons pecked the distinctive stimulus more than the common stimulus; before responding ceased on S- trials, they pecked the common stimulus more than the distinctive one. Mastery of the within-display discrimination during S+ trials preceded mastery of the between-trials discrimination. These findings extend the Jenkins-Sainsbury analysis of discriminations based upon a single distinguishing feature to discriminations in which common and distinctive elements are associated with both the positive and negative discriminative stimuli. The similarity of these findings to other effects found in autoshaping-approach to signals that forecast reinforcement and withdrawal from signals that forecast nonreinforcement-is also discussed.
Similar articles
-
Errorless discrimination established by differential autoshaping.J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Sep;22(2):333-40. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-333. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974. PMID: 16811797 Free PMC article.
-
Autoshaping with common and distinctive stimulus elements, compact and dispersed arrays.J Exp Anal Behav. 1979 May;31(3):383-94. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1979.31-383. J Exp Anal Behav. 1979. PMID: 16812139 Free PMC article.
-
A three-stimulus midsession reversal task in pigeons with visual and spatial discriminative stimuli.Anim Cogn. 2015 Jan;18(1):373-83. doi: 10.1007/s10071-014-0808-2. Epub 2014 Sep 17. Anim Cogn. 2015. PMID: 25227939
-
Food delivery as a conditional stimulus: Feature-learning and memory in pigeons.J Exp Anal Behav. 1979 Mar;31(2):189-207. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1979.31-189. J Exp Anal Behav. 1979. PMID: 16812125 Free PMC article.
-
Extinction reveals stimulus control: latent learning of feature-negative discriminations in pigeons.J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1987 Jan;13(1):52-64. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1987. PMID: 3819651
Cited by
-
The role of observing and attention in establishing stimulus control.J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 May;43(3):365-81. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.43-365. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985. PMID: 3894561 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The nature of discrimination learning in pigeons.Learn Behav. 2008 Aug;36(3):188-99. doi: 10.3758/lb.36.3.188. Learn Behav. 2008. PMID: 18683464
-
Translations in Stimulus-Stimulus Pairing: Autoshaping of Learner Vocalizations.Perspect Behav Sci. 2019 Nov 25;43(1):57-103. doi: 10.1007/s40614-019-00228-9. eCollection 2020 Mar. Perspect Behav Sci. 2019. PMID: 32440645 Free PMC article.
-
Monitoring same/different discrimination behavior in time and space: finding differences and anticipatory discrimination behavior.Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Apr;17(2):250-6. doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.2.250. Psychon Bull Rev. 2010. PMID: 20382928
-
Active change detection by pigeons and humans.J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2013 Oct;39(4):383-9. doi: 10.1037/a0033313. Epub 2013 Jul 22. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2013. PMID: 23875530 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources