Preference for mixed versus constant delay of reinforcement
- PMID: 16811909
- PMCID: PMC1333458
- DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1976.25-257
Preference for mixed versus constant delay of reinforcement
Abstract
Preference for constant and mixed delay of reinforcement was studied using concurrent equal variable-interval schedules. For four pigeons, pecking one key was reinforced following constant delays of 8 sec and mixed delays of 6 or 10 and 2 or 14 sec. Pecking a second key was reinforced following constant delays of 0, 8, 16, and 32 sec. For two additional pigeons, pecking one key was reinforced following delays of 30, 15 or 45, 5 or 55, and 0 or 60 sec. Reinforcements on the other key were delayed 30 sec. It was found that (a) pigeons preferred mixed relative to constant delay of reinforcement, and (b) preference for mixed delay of reinforcement increased as the range of delay interval variability increased.
Similar articles
-
Key pecking of pigeons under variable-interval schedules of briefly signaled delayed reinforcement: effects of variable-interval value.J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Sep;58(2):277-86. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.58-277. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992. PMID: 1402602 Free PMC article.
-
Preference for mixed versus constant delays of reinforcement: Effect of probability of the short, mixed delay.J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Mar;39(2):257-66. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.39-257. J Exp Anal Behav. 1983. PMID: 16812318 Free PMC article.
-
Mechanisms underlying the effects of unsignaled delayed reinforcement on key pecking of pigeons under variable-interval schedules.J Exp Anal Behav. 1998 Mar;69(2):103-22. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1998.69-103. J Exp Anal Behav. 1998. PMID: 9540229 Free PMC article.
-
The concurrent reinforcement of two interresponse times: the relative frequency of an interresponse time equals its relative harmonic length.J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 May;12(3):403-11. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-403. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969. PMID: 16811364 Free PMC article.
-
Concurrent performances: synthesizing rate constancies by manipulating contingencies for a single response.J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 Mar;17(2):139-45. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.17-139. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972. PMID: 16811575 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Assessing evidence for a common function of delay in causal learning and reward discounting.Front Psychol. 2012 Nov 15;3:460. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00460. eCollection 2012. Front Psychol. 2012. PMID: 23162508 Free PMC article.
-
Unification of models for choice between delayed reinforcers.J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Jan;53(1):189-200. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-189. J Exp Anal Behav. 1990. PMID: 2299288 Free PMC article.
-
Incentive theory: II. Models for choice.J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Sep;38(2):217-32. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.38-217. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982. PMID: 16812299 Free PMC article.
-
Isolating behavioral mechanisms of intertemporal choice: nicotine effects on delay discounting and amount sensitivity.J Exp Anal Behav. 2009 Mar;91(2):213-23. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2009.91-213. J Exp Anal Behav. 2009. PMID: 19794835 Free PMC article.
-
The Relevance of Operant Behavior in Conceptualizing the Psychological Well-Being of Captive Animals.Perspect Behav Sci. 2020 Aug 10;43(3):617-654. doi: 10.1007/s40614-020-00259-7. eCollection 2020 Sep. Perspect Behav Sci. 2020. PMID: 33029580 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources