Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1977 Mar;27(2):351-62.
doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-351.

The effect of reinforcement differences on choice and response distribution during stimulus compounding

The effect of reinforcement differences on choice and response distribution during stimulus compounding

M C Bushnell et al. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Mar.

Abstract

In Experiments I and II, rats were trained to respond on one lever during light and another during tone. The absence of tone and light controlled response cessation. In the multiple schedule of Experiment I, all reinforcements were received for responding in tone or light; in the chain schedule of Experiment II, all reinforcements were received in no tone + no light for not responding. Experiment I subjects, for which tone and light were associated with response and reinforcement increase, responded significantly more to tone-plus-light than to tone or light alone (additive summation). Experiment II subjects, for which tone and light were associated with response increase and reinforcement decrease, responded comparably to tone, light, and tone + light. Thus, additive summation was observed when stimulus-response and stimulus-reinforcer associations in tone and light were both positive, but not when they were conflicting. All subjects in both experiments responded predominantly on the light-correlated lever during tone + light, even when light intensity was reduced in testing. Furthermore, when a light was presented to a subject engaged in tone-associated responding, all subjects immediately switched the locus of responding to the light-correlated lever. No change in locus occurred when a tone was presented to a subject engaged in light-associated responding, irrespective of the stimulus-reinforcer association conditioned to tone. The light-lever preference in tone + light indicates that the heightened responding observed in Experiment I was not the summation of tone-associated behavior with light-associated behavior. Rather, it appears to be the result of a facilitation of one operant (light-associated responding) by the reinforcement-associated cue for the other.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Psychol Bull. 1972 Sep;78(3):189-208 - PubMed
    1. J Exp Psychol. 1969 Aug;81(2):340-3 - PubMed
    1. Psychol Rep. 1965 Aug;17(1):239-46 - PubMed
    1. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1967 Aug;64(1):128-32 - PubMed
    1. J Exp Psychol. 1967 Apr;73(4):517-25 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources