Complex learning and information processing by pigeons: a critical analysis
- PMID: 16812079
- PMCID: PMC1332854
- DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-565
Complex learning and information processing by pigeons: a critical analysis
Abstract
THREE MODELS OF CONDITIONAL DISCRIMINATION LEARNING BY PIGEONS ARE DESCRIBED: stimulus configuration learning, the multiple-rule model, and concept learning. A review of the literature reveals that true concept learning is not characteristic of the behavior of pigeons in matching-to-sample, oddity-from-sample, or symbolic matching studies. Instead, pigeons learn a set of sample-specific S(D) rules. Transfer of the discrimination to novel stimuli, at least along the hue dimension, is predicted by a "coding hypothesis", which holds that pigeons make a unique, but usually unobserved response, R(1), to each sample, and that the comparison stimulus chosen depends on which R(1) was emitted in the presence of the sample. Convincing evidence is found that pigeons do code sample hues, but there is little evidence that allows one to infer that the "coding event" must have behavioral properties. Parameters of the conditional discrimination paradigm are identified, and it is shown that by appropriate parametric manipulation, a variety of analogous tasks may be generated for both human and animal subjects. The tasks make possible the comparative study of complex learning, attention, memory, and information processing, with the added advantage that behavior processes may be compared systematically across tasks.
Similar articles
-
Coding in pigeons: Multiple-coding versus single-code/default strategies.J Exp Anal Behav. 2015 May;103(3):472-83. doi: 10.1002/jeab.153. Epub 2015 Apr 20. J Exp Anal Behav. 2015. PMID: 25894105
-
The oddity preference effect and the concept of difference in pigeons.Learn Behav. 2016 Dec;44(4):320-328. doi: 10.3758/s13420-016-0219-0. Learn Behav. 2016. PMID: 27059232
-
Flexible learning of matching and mismatching by pigeons.Behav Processes. 2022 Sep;201:104715. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2022.104715. Epub 2022 Jul 25. Behav Processes. 2022. PMID: 35901936
-
Comparing cognition by integrating concept learning, proactive interference, and list memory.Learn Behav. 2018 Jun;46(2):107-123. doi: 10.3758/s13420-018-0316-3. Learn Behav. 2018. PMID: 29492785 Review.
-
Columban Simulation Project 2.0: Numerical Competence and Orthographic Processing in Pigeons and Primates.Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 17;10:3017. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03017. eCollection 2019. Front Psychol. 2020. PMID: 32038392 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Using stimulus equivalence procedures to teach name-face matching to adults with brain injuries.J Appl Behav Anal. 1992 Summer;25(2):461-75. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-461. J Appl Behav Anal. 1992. PMID: 1634433 Free PMC article.
-
Does conditional discrimination learning by pigeons necessarily involve hierarchical relationships?J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Nov;52(3):249-60. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.52-249. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989. PMID: 16812596 Free PMC article.
-
Capacity and limits of associative memory in pigeons.Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Apr;12(2):350-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03196384. Psychon Bull Rev. 2005. PMID: 16082818
-
Children's identity matching and oddity: assessing control by specific and general sample-comparison relations.J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Jan;51(1):47-64. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.51-47. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989. PMID: 2921587 Free PMC article.
-
Stimulus class membership established via stimulus-reinforcer relations.J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 Mar;47(2):159-75. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1987.47-159. J Exp Anal Behav. 1987. PMID: 3572297 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials