Automaintenance in guinea pigs: effects of feeding regimen and omission training
- PMID: 16812086
- PMCID: PMC1332730
- DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1978.30-37
Automaintenance in guinea pigs: effects of feeding regimen and omission training
Abstract
Behavior maintained by stimulus-reinforcer pairings was examined. Guinea pigs maintained at 85 per cent of free-feeding weights reliably contacted a retractable lever presented before delivery of a single piece of guinea-pig chow or a 45-milligram guinea-pig pellet. When animals were given free access to one food and received the second food preceded by the lever, contact responses persisted. Such responses seldom occurred when a single food was freely available and was also delivered after lever presentation. Introduction of an omission training (negative automaintenance) procedure, in which lever contacts resulted in lever retraction and prevented food delivery, strongly reduced lever contacts. Observation indicated that mouthing the food cup, instead of the lever, became the prominent behavior during the prefood stimulus under the omission training procedure.
Similar articles
-
Lever-contact responses in rats: automaintenance with and without a negative response-reinforcer dependency.J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Nov;22(3):497-506. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-497. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974. PMID: 16811813 Free PMC article.
-
Autoshaping in the rat: Effects of omission on the form of the response.J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Jul;36(1):75-91. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1981.36-75. J Exp Anal Behav. 1981. PMID: 16812233 Free PMC article.
-
Stimulus- and response-reinforcer contingencies in autoshaping, operant, classical, and omission training procedures in rats.J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Jul;28(1):59-69. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.28-59. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977. PMID: 16812014 Free PMC article.
-
Autoshaping, random control, and omission training in the rat.J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Nov;26(3):451-62. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.26-451. J Exp Anal Behav. 1976. PMID: 16811960 Free PMC article.
-
Rate changes after unscheduled omission and presentation of reinforcement.J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 May;15(3):261-70. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.15-261. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971. PMID: 16811512 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Drug effects on the performance of pigeons under a negative automaintenance schedule.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1979 Jan 31;60(2):207-10. doi: 10.1007/BF00432295. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1979. PMID: 106431
-
Stimulus-food pairings produce stimulus-directed touch-screen responding in cynomolgus monkeys (macaca fascicularis) with or without a positive response contingency.J Exp Anal Behav. 2009 Jul;92(1):41-55. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2009.92-41. J Exp Anal Behav. 2009. PMID: 20119521 Free PMC article.
-
The control of responding by sounds: unusual effect of reinforcement.J Exp Anal Behav. 1979 Sep;32(2):167-81. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1979.32-167. J Exp Anal Behav. 1979. PMID: 501270 Free PMC article.
-
Accounting for negative automaintenance in pigeons: a dual learning systems approach and factored representations.PLoS One. 2014 Oct 27;9(10):e111050. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111050. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 25347531 Free PMC article.
-
Negative automaintenance omission training is effective.J Exp Anal Behav. 2006 Jul;86(1):1-10. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2006.36-05. J Exp Anal Behav. 2006. PMID: 16903489 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources