Reinforcement and substitution in humans: a multiple-response analysis
- PMID: 16812105
- PMCID: PMC1332769
- DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1978.30-243
Reinforcement and substitution in humans: a multiple-response analysis
Abstract
Three adult human subjects engaged in activities such as reading, sewing, artwork, and candlemaking while living alone in a laboratory apartment 24 hours per day for several weeks. After a baseline period in which the activities were fully available, access to a particular activity (contingent response) was made dependent on engaging in another less-preferred activity (instrumental response). The contingencies produced substantial increases in instrumental responding, and responding decreased toward baseline levels when the dependency was removed. Under the contingent conditions, time earned for the concurrent activity was always less than the baseline level. To determine the contribution of this reduction to the instrumental increase, access to the contingent activity was restricted in the absence of any dependency. The results indicated that increases among responses that filled the newly available time could be selective, e.g., artwork increased when reading was restricted but candlemaking did not. It was concluded that the reductions in the contingent response that accompany contingencies usually do not exclusively determine instrumental increases, but selective increases can contribute to the increase in time devoted to the instrumental response.
Similar articles
-
Response deprivation and reinforcement in applied settings: A preliminary analysis.J Appl Behav Anal. 1980 Winter;13(4):595-609. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1980.13-595. J Appl Behav Anal. 1980. PMID: 16795635 Free PMC article.
-
Motivational effects of smoked marijuana: behavioral contingencies and low-probability activities.J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Jan;53(1):5-19. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-5. J Exp Anal Behav. 1990. PMID: 2299291 Free PMC article.
-
Relations between decision-making deficits and discriminating contingencies following brain injury.Brain Inj. 2001 Dec;15(12):1061-71. doi: 10.1080/02699050110086887. Brain Inj. 2001. PMID: 11712952
-
Positive conditioned suppression: Transfer of performance between contingent and noncontingent reinforcement situations.J Exp Anal Behav. 1980 Jan;33(1):51-7. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1980.33-51. J Exp Anal Behav. 1980. PMID: 16812161 Free PMC article.
-
The noneffects of contingent reinforcement for attending behavior on work accomplished.J Appl Behav Anal. 1972 Spring;5(1):7-17. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1972.5-7. J Appl Behav Anal. 1972. PMID: 16795322 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Comments on the 1950s applications and extensions of Skinner's operant psychology.Behav Anal. 2003 Fall;26(2):281-95. doi: 10.1007/BF03392082. Behav Anal. 2003. PMID: 22478408 Free PMC article.
-
Performance enhancement in a semi-autonomous confined microsociety.Pavlov J Biol Sci. 1988 Jul-Sep;23(3):111-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02701285. Pavlov J Biol Sci. 1988. PMID: 3174260
-
The effects of response cost and response restriction on a multiple-response repertoire with humans.J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Jan;59(1):173-92. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.59-173. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993. PMID: 16812683 Free PMC article.
-
Response-restriction analysis: II. Alteration of activity preferences.J Appl Behav Anal. 2003 Spring;36(1):59-76. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2003.36-59. J Appl Behav Anal. 2003. PMID: 12723867 Free PMC article.
-
The utility of verbal and behavioral assessments of value.J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Nov;54(3):173-84. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.54-173. J Exp Anal Behav. 1990. PMID: 2103580 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources