Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1979 May;31(3):307-20.
doi: 10.1901/jeab.1979.31-307.

The effects of the stimulus-reinforcer correlation in a discrete-trials IRT>t procedure

The effects of the stimulus-reinforcer correlation in a discrete-trials IRT>t procedure

M G Wessells. J Exp Anal Behav. 1979 May.

Abstract

The correlation between a keylight and food in a discrete-trials, interresponse-time-greater-than 6-sec (IRT>6-sec) procedure was varied by manipulating the rate of response-independent food presentation in the intertrial interval. When the correlation was positive, the rates of pecking in the IRT>6-sec condition were high and food was obtained on only about 5% of the trials. Likewise, responding was maintained at a high rate in yoked birds that received the same presentations of the light and food as the birds in the IRT>6-sec condition. When the rate of reinforcement between trials was equated to or made greater than the rate of reinforcement within trials, the response rate decreased for all birds, and those decreases were considerably larger for the yoked birds. However, the percentage of trials in which reinforced responses occurred under the IRT>6-sec procedure did not increase substantially when the light and food were either uncorrelated or negatively correlated. The percentage of trials in which a reinforcer was obtained increased when the keylight was left on continuously and the discriminative stimulus was not presented on the key. The results show that the stimulus-reinforcer correlation affects responding in the discrete-trials IRT>6-sec procedure, but that the effects of the stimulus-reinforcer correlation vary as a function of whether reinforcement is response-dependent or response-independent. The differences between the effects of response-independent and response-dependent pairings and nonpairings of the light and food are best accounted for in terms of differences in the control of responding by background stimuli.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Jan;12(1):43-57 - PubMed
    1. Science. 1971 Mar 5;171(3974):923-5 - PubMed
    1. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Nov;12(6):971-6 - PubMed
    1. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Mar;27(2):341-50 - PubMed
    1. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Jul;12(4):511-20 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources