Conditioned reinforcement as a function of duration of stimulus
- PMID: 16812230
- PMCID: PMC1333051
- DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1981.36-41
Conditioned reinforcement as a function of duration of stimulus
Abstract
Pigeons were provided with three keys. Pecking the center key produced grain on a schedule that alternated at unpredictable times between a variable-interval component and extinction. On concurrent variable-interval schedules, pecking either side key produced a stimulus associated with the variable-interval component on the center key provided that said schedule was currently in effect. The independent variable was the length of time this stimulus remained on the keys. Pecking one side key produced the stimulus for 27 seconds, whereas the duration produced by pecking the other key varied for successive blocks of sessions. For the first four birds, the values tested were 3, 9, 27, and 81 seconds. For the second group, numbering three birds, the values tested were 1, 3, 9, and 27 seconds. The dependent variable was the proportion of total side key pecks that occurred on the variable key. For all birds, the function was positive in slope and negative in acceleration. This finding supports a formulation that ascribes the maintenance of observing responses in a normal setting to the fact that the subject exposes itself to the positive discriminative stimulus for a longer mean duration than it does to the negative stimulus.
Similar articles
-
Punishment of observing by the negative discriminative stimulus.J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jan;21(1):37-44. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-37. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974. PMID: 16811733 Free PMC article.
-
Mechanisms underlying the effects of unsignaled delayed reinforcement on key pecking of pigeons under variable-interval schedules.J Exp Anal Behav. 1998 Mar;69(2):103-22. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1998.69-103. J Exp Anal Behav. 1998. PMID: 9540229 Free PMC article.
-
Separating the effects of salience and disparity on the rate of observing.J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Nov;40(3):253-64. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.40-253. J Exp Anal Behav. 1983. PMID: 16812348 Free PMC article.
-
On conditioned reinforcing effects of negative discriminative stimuli.J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Nov;52(3):335-9. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.52-335. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989. PMID: 16812600 Free PMC article.
-
Drug effects on responding maintained by stimulus-reinforcer and response-reinforcer contingencies.J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Sep;30(2):187-96. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.30-187. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978. PMID: 702026 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
The role of observing and attention in establishing stimulus control.J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 May;43(3):365-81. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.43-365. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985. PMID: 3894561 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The effect of negative stimulus presentations on observing-response rates.J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Nov;46(3):281-91. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-281. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986. PMID: 16812463 Free PMC article.
-
Testing the reinforcing properties of S-: a replication of Lieberman's procedure.J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Jan;41(1):17-25. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.41-17. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984. PMID: 6699539 Free PMC article.
-
Matching and conditioned reinforcement rate.J Exp Anal Behav. 2006 Mar;85(2):167-80. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2006.34-05. J Exp Anal Behav. 2006. PMID: 16673824 Free PMC article.
-
Conditioned reinforcement value and resistance to change.J Exp Anal Behav. 2008 May;89(3):263-98. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2008-89-263. J Exp Anal Behav. 2008. PMID: 18540215 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources