Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1982 Nov;38(3):291-304.
doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.38-291.

Topography of signal-centered behavior in the rat: Effects of deprivation state and reinforcer type

Topography of signal-centered behavior in the rat: Effects of deprivation state and reinforcer type

G C Davey et al. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Nov.

Abstract

In a series of three experiments, groups of food-deprived and water-deprived rats were given pairings of a retractable lever (CS(+)) with response-independent deliveries of either solid or liquid reinforcers. In Experiment 1 food-deprived rats given a solid-pellet reinforcer differentially tended to sniff, paw, mouth, and bite the CS(+) lever more often than a lever that was not paired with food (CS(-)), whereas food-deprived rats given a liquid reinforcer tended to differentially sniff, paw, and lick the CS(+) lever. 23(1/2)-hour water-deprived rats given liquid reinforcers showed very little CS(+) contact. In Experiment 2 increasing the severity of water deprivation from 23(1/2) to 47(1/2) hours significantly increased CS(+) contact. In Experiment 3, subjects that were simultaneously food and water deprived and given a water reinforcer failed to exhibit differential CS(+) contact, but subjects that were simultaneously food and water deprived and given a food reinforcer did acquire differential CS(+)-contact behavior. These results suggest that (a) even under a single motivational state the nature of signal-centered behavior can be determined by type of reinforcer, (b) although water reinforcement produces less signal contact than food reinforcement, this can be facilitated with more severe water-deprivation levels, and (c) high CS-contact rates using food reinforcement are not simply a product of reductions in body weight with food deprivation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1956 Apr;49(2):177-80 - PubMed
    1. J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Jul;26(1):1-13 - PubMed
    1. J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Jul;36(1):75-91 - PubMed
    1. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1954 Dec;47(6):450-3 - PubMed
    1. Annu Rev Psychol. 1978;29:587-612 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources