Effects of stimulus frequency and reinforcement variables on reaction time
- PMID: 16812648
- PMCID: PMC1323068
- DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1992.57-47
Effects of stimulus frequency and reinforcement variables on reaction time
Abstract
Pigeons pecked at one of two black forms, "+" or "O," either of which could appear alone on a white computer monitor screen. In baseline series of sessions, each form appeared equally often, and two pecks at it produced food reinforcement on 10% of trials. Test series varied the relative probability or duration of reinforcement or frequency of appearance of the targets. Peck reaction times, measured from target onset to the first peck, were found to vary as a function of reinforcement probability but not as a function of relative target frequency or of reinforcement duration. Reaction times to the two targets remained approximately equal as long as the probability of reinforcement, per trial, was equal for the targets, even if the relative frequency of the targets differed by as much as 19 to 1. The results address issues raised in visual search experiments and indicate that attentional priming is unimportant when targets are easy to detect. The results also suggest that equalizing reinforcement probability per trial for all targets removes differential reinforcement as an important variable. That reaction time was sensitive to the probability but not the duration of reinforcement raises interesting questions about the processes reflected in reaction time compared with rate as a response measure.
Similar articles
-
Mechanisms underlying the effects of unsignaled delayed reinforcement on key pecking of pigeons under variable-interval schedules.J Exp Anal Behav. 1998 Mar;69(2):103-22. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1998.69-103. J Exp Anal Behav. 1998. PMID: 9540229 Free PMC article.
-
Contrast as seen in visual search reaction times.J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Nov;52(3):199-211. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.52-199. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989. PMID: 2584913 Free PMC article.
-
Behavioral variability and frequency-dependent selection.J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Sep;58(2):241-63. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.58-241. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992. PMID: 1402601 Free PMC article.
-
Control of responding during stimuli that precede transitions in reinforcement frequency.J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 Mar;47(2):201-12. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1987.47-201. J Exp Anal Behav. 1987. PMID: 16812477 Free PMC article.
-
Two different kinds of key peck in the pigeon: some properties of responses maintained by negative and positive response-reinforcer contingencies.J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 Sep;18(2):201-16. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.18-201. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972. PMID: 16811623 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Mental rotation and temporal contingencies.J Exp Anal Behav. 1998 Sep;70(2):203-14. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1998.70-203. J Exp Anal Behav. 1998. PMID: 9768507 Free PMC article.
-
A random-walk interpretation of incentive effects in visual discrimination.Behav Processes. 2010 Oct;85(3):209-14. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.07.013. Epub 2010 Aug 11. Behav Processes. 2010. PMID: 20708661 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Reaction time signatures of discriminative processes: differential effects of stimulus similarity and incentive.Learn Behav. 2004 May;32(2):157-72. doi: 10.3758/bf03196017. Learn Behav. 2004. PMID: 15281388
-
Reaction times identify a Pavlovian component in a two-choice discrimination.Behav Processes. 2009 Jun;81(2):195-204. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.01.007. Epub 2009 Feb 3. Behav Processes. 2009. PMID: 19429212 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources