Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Summer;39(2):161-71.
doi: 10.1901/jaba.2006.79-05.

The efficacy of noncontingent escape for decreasing children's disruptive behavior during restorative dental treatment

Affiliations

The efficacy of noncontingent escape for decreasing children's disruptive behavior during restorative dental treatment

Patrick M O'Callaghan et al. J Appl Behav Anal. 2006 Summer.

Abstract

We evaluated the effectiveness of a dentist-implemented behavioral intervention in which brief escape from dental treatment was provided on a regular basis, independent of the child's behavior. Within a multiple baseline design across subjects, 5 children, ages 4 to 7 years, were provided with temporary escape from dental treatment on a fixed-time schedule. The intervals were signaled by an electronic timer worn by the dentist. Clinically significant reductions were observed in physically disruptive behavior across all 5 children with the introduction of noncontingent escape, and verbally disruptive behavior was markedly reduced in 4 of the 5 children. In addition, the dental staff s use of physical restraint was reduced to near zero across all 5 children. The research extends the literature in both clinical dentistry and in applied behavior analysis by demonstrating that a dentist can easily and effectively implement noncontingent reinforcement to produce clinically significant and socially important changes in children's health behavior.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Percentage of 15-s intervals containing disruptive behavior per 3 min of treatment for each child across subsequent visits.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Percentage of verbally disruptive behavior (light shaded bars) and physically disruptive behavior (dark shaded bars) per visit for each child across baseline and treatment.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Average number of restraints per visit in baseline (light shaded bars) and in treatment (dark shaded bars) for each child.

References

    1. Allen K.D, Barone V.J, Kuhn B. A behavioral prescription for promoting behavior analysis within pediatrics. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1993;26:493–502. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allen K.D, Hodges E.D, Knudsen S.K. Comparing four methods to inform parents about child behavior management: How to inform for consent. Pediatric Dentistry. 1995;17:180–185. - PubMed
    1. Allen K.D, Hutfless S, Larzelere R. Evaluation of two predictors of child disruptive behavior during restorative dental treatment. Journal of Dentistry for Children. 2003;70:221–225. - PubMed
    1. Allen K.D, Kotil D, Hutfless S, Larzelere R, Beiraghi S. Comparison of computerized anesthesia delivery with traditional syringe in preschool children. Pediatric Dentistry. 2002;24:315–320. - PubMed
    1. Allen K.D, Loiben T, Allen S.J, Stanley R.T. Dentist-implemented contingent escape for management of disruptive child behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1992;25:629–636. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources