Rationale for the revascularization arm of the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes (BARI 2D) Trial

Abstract

Modern coronary revascularization therapies, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), continue to evolve and are widely applied. However, for patients with mild stable angina, or those who are asymptomatic with angiographically documented coronary artery disease (CAD), no survival benefit or reduction in the incidence of myocardial infarction has been demonstrated with CABG or PCI, except in the case of subgroups with angiographically determined high risk due to extensive multivessel disease with depressed LV function or left main CAD. At the same time, medical therapy continues to advance, with demonstrable benefit in both primary and secondary prevention of atherosclerotic coronary disease events. Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, at increased risk for adverse cardiac events, have been shown to benefit from these approaches as well. However, in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patients with documented ischemia and angiographically significant CAD, the incremental benefit-or hazard-associated with early revascularization superimposed on aggressive medical and risk factor modification therapies is unknown. We discuss the background and rationale for investigating the impact of early revascularization in patients with diabetes and CAD.