Yield of tissue sampling for subepithelial lesions evaluated by EUS: a comparison between forceps biopsies and endoscopic submucosal resection
- PMID: 16813799
- DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.02.027
Yield of tissue sampling for subepithelial lesions evaluated by EUS: a comparison between forceps biopsies and endoscopic submucosal resection
Abstract
Background: In most circumstances, subepithelial tumors lack distinct endoscopic and ultrasonographic features. Consequently, definitive diagnosis usually requires tissue acquisition and pathologic confirmation. Establishing a tissue diagnosis is difficult because the yield of forceps biopsies is low. However, prospective data evaluating tissue sampling techniques for subepithelial lesions are currently lacking.
Objective: Our purpose was to prospectively determine the diagnostic yield of endoscopic submucosal-mucosal resection (ESMR) compared with forceps biopsy for lesions limited to the submucosa (third endosonographic layer) of the GI tract.
Design: A prospective head-to-head comparison was performed.
Setting: The study was performed in a tertiary care hospital.
Patients: Study patients were 23 adults with subepithelial lesions limited to the submucosa.
Intervention: All submucosal lesions underwent forceps biopsy followed by endoscopic submucosal resection. Biopsy specimens were obtained with large-capacity "jumbo" forceps. A total of 4 double passes (8 biopsy specimens) were collected from each lesion with use of the bite-on-bite technique. Endoscopic resection was then performed with an electrosurgical snare or cap-fitted endoscopic mucosal resection device.
Main outcome measurement: The main outcome measurement was the diagnostic yield of biopsy forceps compared with endoscopic submucosal resection.
Results: Twenty-three patients with lesions limited to the submucosa were identified by endoscopic ultrasonography. All lesions underwent forceps biopsy followed by ESMR. The diagnostic yield of the jumbo forceps biopsy was 4 of 23 (17%), whereas the diagnostic yield of ESMR was 20 of 23 (87%) (P = .0001, McNemar test).
Conclusion: In the evaluation of subepithelial lesions limited to the submucosa, ESMR has a significantly higher diagnostic yield than jumbo forceps biopsy with use of the bite-on-bite technique.
Similar articles
-
Yield of tissue sampling for submucosal lesions evaluated by EUS.Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Jan;57(1):68-72. doi: 10.1067/mge.2003.34. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003. PMID: 12518134
-
Diagnostic yield and safety of jumbo biopsy forceps in patients with subepithelial lesions of the upper and lower GI tract.Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jun;75(6):1147-52. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.01.032. Epub 2012 Mar 15. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012. PMID: 22425270
-
Utility of endoscopic ultrasound for the diagnosis and treatment of submucosal tumors of the upper gastrointestinal tract.Rom J Gastroenterol. 2003 Sep;12(3):215-29. Rom J Gastroenterol. 2003. PMID: 14502323 Review.
-
Diagnostic yield of tissue sampling using a bite-on-bite technique for incidental subepithelial lesions.Korean J Intern Med. 2009 Jun;24(2):101-5. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2009.24.2.101. Epub 2009 Jun 8. Korean J Intern Med. 2009. PMID: 19543487 Free PMC article.
-
Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Lesions: Evolution in Management and Endoscopic Resection Techniques.Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2025 Feb 8;27(1):12. doi: 10.1007/s11894-025-00966-8. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2025. PMID: 39921832 Review.
Cited by
-
Diagnosis of Pancreatic Solid Lesions, Subepithelial Lesions, and Lymph Nodes Using Endoscopic Ultrasound.J Clin Med. 2021 Mar 5;10(5):1076. doi: 10.3390/jcm10051076. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 33807558 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Systematic Endoscopic Approach for Diagnosing Gastric Subepithelial Tumors.Gut Liver. 2022 Jan 15;16(1):19-27. doi: 10.5009/gnl20296. Gut Liver. 2022. PMID: 33707348 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The retrospective comparison between submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection and endoscopic submucosal excavation for managing esophageal submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer.Surg Endosc. 2020 Jan;34(1):417-428. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06785-z. Epub 2019 Apr 10. Surg Endosc. 2020. PMID: 30972622
-
Outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic resection of gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions: a single-center retrospective cohort study.Ann Gastroenterol. 2021 Jul-Aug;34(4):516-520. doi: 10.20524/aog.2021.0621. Epub 2021 Apr 2. Ann Gastroenterol. 2021. PMID: 34276190 Free PMC article.
-
Tunneled biopsy is an underutilised, simple, safe and efficient method for tissue acquisition from subepithelial tumours.World J Clin Cases. 2021 Jul 26;9(21):5822-5829. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i21.5822. World J Clin Cases. 2021. PMID: 34368301 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous