Penis conserving treatment for T1 and T2 penile carcinoma: clinical implications of a local recurrence
- PMID: 16813892
- DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.03.063
Penis conserving treatment for T1 and T2 penile carcinoma: clinical implications of a local recurrence
Abstract
Purpose: We evaluated our experience with primary tumor treatment for T1 and T2 penile squamous cell carcinoma and discussed the clinical implications of a local recurrence.
Materials and methods: The primary tumor treatment and clinical course of 257 patients with T1 or T2 penile carcinoma were evaluated. Primary tumor treatment consisted of penis preservation in 157 and (partial) amputation in 100 patients. Median followup was 106 months (range 16 to 541).
Results: The 5-year local recurrence-free estimate after penis preservation was similar for T1 and T2 tumors (log rank test p = 0.1) and overall 63% (CI: 54%-72%) compared to 88% (CI: 81%-95%) for partial amputation (log rank test p = 0.0003). In case of a local recurrence after penis preserving treatment, local control could be achieved in 94% (51 of 54) of cases. Of patients with T1 tumors treated with penis preservation, regional recurrence developed in 33% (7 of 21) of patients with local recurrence compared to only 6% (3 of 47) of patients without local recurrences (Fisher's exact test p = 0.005). Of the patients with T2 tumors treated with penis preservation, regional recurrence developed in 27% (9 of 33) of patients with local recurrence compared to 27% (12 of 45) of patients without local recurrence (chi-square test p = 0.96). Of 10 patients with a local recurrence after partial amputation of the penis, 9 died of disease.
Conclusions: The incidence of local recurrence increases with penis preservation but can be treated accurately in most cases. Local recurrences can signify lymphatic regional spread. A local recurrence after penile amputation carries a poor prognosis.
Comment in
-
Organ-sparing techniques for penile cancer: quo vadis?Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2007 Apr;4(4):182-3. doi: 10.1038/ncpuro0737. Epub 2007 Feb 20. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2007. PMID: 17310235 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Recurrence patterns of squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: recommendations for follow-up based on a two-centre analysis of 700 patients.Eur Urol. 2008 Jul;54(1):161-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.04.016. Epub 2008 Apr 15. Eur Urol. 2008. PMID: 18440124
-
Melanoma of the penis, scrotum and male urethra: a 40-year single institution experience.J Urol. 2005 Jun;173(6):1958-65. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000159207.91737.53. J Urol. 2005. PMID: 15879790
-
Penile brachytherapy: results for 49 patients.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Jun 1;62(2):460-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.10.016. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005. PMID: 15890588
-
[Carcinoma of the penis: our experience in 24 cases and review of the literature].Arch Esp Urol. 1993 Apr;46(3):203-8. Arch Esp Urol. 1993. PMID: 8512356 Review. Spanish.
-
Local recurrence of squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.Urol Clin North Am. 1994 Nov;21(4):739-43. Urol Clin North Am. 1994. PMID: 7974902 Review.
Cited by
-
Radical penectomy, a compromise for life: results from the PECAD study.Transl Androl Urol. 2020 Jun;9(3):1306-1313. doi: 10.21037/tau.2020.04.04. Transl Androl Urol. 2020. PMID: 32676414 Free PMC article.
-
Penile cancer: a Brazilian consensus statement for low- and middle-income countries.J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020 Dec;146(12):3281-3296. doi: 10.1007/s00432-020-03417-1. Epub 2020 Oct 26. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020. PMID: 33104884 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Organ-sparing surgery of penile cancer: higher rate of local recurrence yet no impact on overall survival.World J Urol. 2020 Feb;38(2):417-424. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02793-9. Epub 2019 May 6. World J Urol. 2020. PMID: 31062123 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of efficacy between brachytherapy and penectomy in patients with penile cancer: a meta-analysis.Oncotarget. 2017 Jun 28;8(59):100469-100477. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18761. eCollection 2017 Nov 21. Oncotarget. 2017. PMID: 29245993 Free PMC article.
-
Total Margin Control Is Superior to Traditional Margin Assessment for Treatment of Low-Stage Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma.J Urol. 2024 Jan;211(1):90-100. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003736. Epub 2023 Oct 3. J Urol. 2024. PMID: 37788015 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources