Studies on chromosome aberration induction: what can they tell us about DNA repair?
- PMID: 16814619
- DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2006.05.033
Studies on chromosome aberration induction: what can they tell us about DNA repair?
Abstract
Many, if not the majority of spontaneous or induced mutations in somatic mammalian cells associated with cancer are large chromosome level changes. For exposure to carcinogenic agents, certain specific chromosomal aberrations are likely to lie early along the pathway leading from initial molecular damage to cancer. The kinds of aberrations that occur, and the positions of breakpoints involved in their formation, can reveal not only genes and controlling elements whose expression or suppression underlie the molecular nature of the initiation of malignant transformation, but also how structural and functional features of chromatin can affect processes involved in repair or mis-repair of initial DNA damage. Thus, cytogenetics can provide information in ways that are not readily appreciated in studies requiring disruption of chromatin organization as it exists in the cell and its tissue context, and where DNA repair assays measure effects averaged over the entire genome. Examples include the fact that in contrast to a more efficient repair of single strand or base damage in transcriptionally active chromatin, after ionizing radiation exposure, the preponderance of translocation breakpoints indicating mis-repair occur in transcriptionally active or potentially active chromatin. Cytogenetic studies have led to the recognition that processing of DNA ends - both ends resulting from breaks along chromosomes and natural chromosomal termini, or telomeres - share very interesting similarities and differences. Further, direct observation of chromatin in cells during interphase can speak directly to early stages of aberration formation where processes occur within the context of intact cells, and to the role (or lack thereof) of cell cycle checkpoint responses that often accompany DNA damage. The superior resolution of many of the current molecular cytogenetics approaches, combined with immunocytochemical detection of proteins involved in DNA damage processing, and the availability of repair deficient mutants or knockdown strategies such as RNA interference, suggest that cytogenetics may still provide useful information and set certain restrictions important for rational interpretation of studies of DNA repair and associated protein interactions that can only be carried out in vitro. The intent of this paper is to focus on contributions of studies on the production of chromosomal aberrations following ionizing radiation exposure regarding important insights on associated DNA repair processes involved, and further, on guidelines or constraints they provide for the interpretation of in vitro DNA repair studies that would have been difficult to appreciate without the cytogenetics. We will first briefly summarize some early studies that serve as a reminder of the background on which current studies are based, and then carry forward to the present day certain interesting facets of these studies.
Similar articles
-
Functional cell-cycle chromatin conformation changes in the presence of DNA damage result into chromatid breaks: a new insight in the formation of radiation-induced chromosomal aberrations based on the direct observation of interphase chromatin.Mutat Res. 2010 Aug 14;701(1):27-37. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2010.04.006. Epub 2010 Apr 14. Mutat Res. 2010. PMID: 20398788
-
DNA repair and chromosomal alterations.Mutat Res. 2008 Nov 17;657(1):3-7. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2008.08.017. Epub 2008 Aug 29. Mutat Res. 2008. PMID: 18801460 Review.
-
Ionizing radiation and genetic risks XIV. Potential research directions in the post-genome era based on knowledge of repair of radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks in mammalian somatic cells and the origin of deletions associated with human genomic disorders.Mutat Res. 2005 Oct 15;578(1-2):333-70. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2005.06.020. Epub 2005 Aug 5. Mutat Res. 2005. PMID: 16084534 Review.
-
Chromatin dynamics during cell cycle mediate conversion of DNA damage into chromatid breaks and affect formation of chromosomal aberrations: biological and clinical significance.Mutat Res. 2011 Jun 3;711(1-2):174-86. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2010.12.011. Epub 2010 Dec 24. Mutat Res. 2011. PMID: 21185845 Review.
-
DNA damage processing and aberration formation in plants.Cytogenet Genome Res. 2004;104(1-4):104-8. doi: 10.1159/000077473. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2004. PMID: 15162022 Review.
Cited by
-
Nucleosomes suppress the formation of double-strand DNA breaks during attempted base excision repair of clustered oxidative damages.J Biol Chem. 2014 Jul 18;289(29):19881-93. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.571588. Epub 2014 Jun 2. J Biol Chem. 2014. PMID: 24891506 Free PMC article.
-
Dicentric chromosome assay using a deep learning-based automated system.Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 21;12(1):22097. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25856-1. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 36543843 Free PMC article.
-
Rint1 inactivation triggers genomic instability, ER stress and autophagy inhibition in the brain.Cell Death Differ. 2016 Mar;23(3):454-68. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2015.113. Epub 2015 Sep 18. Cell Death Differ. 2016. PMID: 26383973 Free PMC article.
-
Spatiotemporal characterization of ionizing radiation induced DNA damage foci and their relation to chromatin organization.Mutat Res. 2010 Apr-Jun;704(1-3):78-87. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2009.12.006. Epub 2010 Jan 8. Mutat Res. 2010. PMID: 20060491 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Role of LET and chromatin structure on chromosomal inversion in CHO10B2 cells.Genome Integr. 2014 Jan 28;5(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2041-9414-5-1. Genome Integr. 2014. PMID: 24467838 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources