Utility of the mouse dermal promotion assay in comparing the tumorigenic potential of cigarette mainstream smoke
- PMID: 16814916
- DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2006.05.008
Utility of the mouse dermal promotion assay in comparing the tumorigenic potential of cigarette mainstream smoke
Abstract
The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified a number of the chemical constituents reported in cigarette mainstream smoke (MS) as carcinogens. In the international literature, 81 IARC classified carcinogens have been reported historically in MS. Cigarette smoke is a complex aerosol of minute liquid droplets (termed the particulate phase) suspended within a mixture of gases (CO(2), CO, NO(x), etc.) and semi-volatile compounds. The gases and semi-volatiles are termed the vapor phase. Due to early difficulties in inducing carcinomas in laboratory animals following inhalation exposure to MS, the mouse dermal promotion assay became the standard method of comparing the tumorigenic potential of cigarette smoke condensates (the particulate phase of MS nearly devoid of MS gases and having a significant reduction of the semi-volatile components of the vapor phase). Of the 81 IARC carcinogens reported in MS, 48 are found exclusively in the particulate phase, 29 in the vapor phase only, and four IARC carcinogens in both phases. A general comparison of the quantity and potency of the individual carcinogenic constituents of the MS vapor and particulate phases illustrates that the potential carcinogenic contribution from the vapor phase might be significant. Therefore, the mouse dermal promotion assay may not be a sensitive comparator of the tumorigenic potential of different MSs displaying a diversity of vapor phase components. However, when used in a weight-of-the-evidence approach that includes smoke chemistry, in vitro studies using whole smoke and human exposure studies evaluating both vapor and particulate phase smoke constituents, the mouse dermal promotion assay remains an important risk assessment tool as the only test that reproducibly measures the tumorigenic potential of cigarette smoke condensate.
Similar articles
-
Murine lung tumor response after exposure to cigarette mainstream smoke or its particulate and gas/vapor phase fractions.Toxicology. 2010 Sep 10;275(1-3):10-20. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2010.05.005. Epub 2010 Jun 4. Toxicology. 2010. PMID: 20594951
-
IARC carcinogens reported in cigarette mainstream smoke and their calculated log P values.Food Chem Toxicol. 2003 Jun;41(6):807-17. doi: 10.1016/s0278-6915(03)00021-8. Food Chem Toxicol. 2003. PMID: 12738186
-
Smoke chemistry, in vitro and in vivo toxicology evaluations of the electrically heated cigarette smoking system series K.Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008 Nov;52(2):122-39. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2008.05.014. Epub 2008 Jun 12. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008. PMID: 18590791
-
Perspectives on pulmonary inflammation and lung cancer risk in cigarette smokers.Inhal Toxicol. 2006 Aug;18(9):667-77. doi: 10.1080/08958370600742821. Inhal Toxicol. 2006. PMID: 16864557 Review.
-
Could charcoal filtration of cigarette smoke reduce smoking-induced disease? A review of the literature.Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008 Apr;50(3):359-65. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2008.01.001. Epub 2008 Jan 16. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008. PMID: 18289753 Review.
Cited by
-
Cigarette smoke affects keratinocytes SRB1 expression and localization via H2O2 production and HNE protein adducts formation.PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33592. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033592. Epub 2012 Mar 19. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 22442701 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative tumor promotion assessment of e-cigarette and cigarettes using the in vitro Bhas 42 cell transformation assay.Environ Mol Mutagen. 2017 May;58(4):190-198. doi: 10.1002/em.22091. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2017. PMID: 28444993 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical