Effect of amiodarone and sotalol on ventricular defibrillation threshold: the optimal pharmacological therapy in cardioverter defibrillator patients (OPTIC) trial
- PMID: 16818810
- DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.618421
Effect of amiodarone and sotalol on ventricular defibrillation threshold: the optimal pharmacological therapy in cardioverter defibrillator patients (OPTIC) trial
Abstract
Background: Many patients with implanted cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) receive adjunctive antiarrhythmic drug therapy, most commonly amiodarone or sotalol. The effects of these drugs on defibrillation energy requirements have not been previously assessed in a randomized controlled trial.
Methods and results: The Optimal Pharmacological Therapy in Cardioverter Defibrillator Patients (OPTIC) trial was a randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of amiodarone plus beta-blocker and sotalol versus beta-blocker alone for reduction of ICD shocks. Within OPTIC, a prospectively designed substudy evaluated the effects of the 3 treatment arms on defibrillation energy requirements. Defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) were measured (binary step-down protocol) at baseline and again after 8 to 12 weeks of therapy in 94 patients, of whom 29 were randomized to receive beta-blocker therapy (control group), 35 to amiodarone plus beta-blocker, and 30 to sotalol. In the control group, the mean DFT decreased from 8.77+/-5.15 J at baseline to 7.13+/-3.43 J (P=0.027); in the amiodarone group, DFT increased from 8.53+/-4.29 to 9.82+/-5.84 J (P=0.091). In the sotalol group, DFT decreased from 8.09+/-4.81 to 7.20+/-5.30 J (P=0.21). DFT changes in the beta-blocker and the amiodarone group were significantly different (P=0.006). In all patients, adequate safety margins for defibrillation were maintained. No clinical variable predicted baseline DFT or changes in DFT on therapy.
Conclusions: Although amiodarone increased DFT, the effect size with modern ICD systems is very small. Therefore, DFT reassessment after the institution of antiarrhythmic drug therapy with amiodarone or sotalol is not routinely required.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00257959.
Comment in
-
Follow-up defibrillator testing for antiarrhythmic drugs: probability and uncertainty.Circulation. 2006 Jul 11;114(2):98-100. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.637397. Circulation. 2006. PMID: 16831995 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of beta-blockers, amiodarone plus beta-blockers, or sotalol for prevention of shocks from implantable cardioverter defibrillators: the OPTIC Study: a randomized trial.JAMA. 2006 Jan 11;295(2):165-71. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.2.165. JAMA. 2006. PMID: 16403928 Clinical Trial.
-
Antiarrhythmic drugs in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2005;5(6):371-8. doi: 10.2165/00129784-200505060-00004. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2005. PMID: 16259525 Review.
-
Sotalol in patients with implanted automatic defibrillators: effects on defibrillation and comparison with amiodarone.Can J Cardiol. 1994 Mar;10(2):193-200. Can J Cardiol. 1994. PMID: 8143220 Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of concomitant antiarrhythmic therapy on survival in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005 Jul;28(7):647-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.00164.x. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005. PMID: 16008799
-
[Role of antiarrhythmic drugs in reducing the number of defibrillation shocks].Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 2005 Feb;98(2):140-4. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 2005. PMID: 15787306 Review. French.
Cited by
-
The Saga of Defibrillation Testing: When Less Is More.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2018 May 5;20(6):44. doi: 10.1007/s11886-018-0987-6. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2018. PMID: 29730796 Review.
-
Catheter ablation versus medical therapy for ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischemic heart disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2025 Mar-Apr;25(2):91-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ipej.2025.03.004. Epub 2025 Mar 7. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2025. PMID: 40058526 Free PMC article.
-
[Is intraoperative ICD-testing still necessary?].Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2010 Jun;21(2):123-8. doi: 10.1007/s00399-010-0080-3. Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2010. PMID: 20521150 German.
-
Comparable Efficacy in Ischemic and Non-Ischemic ICD Recipients for the Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death.Biomedicines. 2021 Nov 2;9(11):1595. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9111595. Biomedicines. 2021. PMID: 34829824 Free PMC article.
-
Electrophysiologic Considerations After Sudden Cardiac Arrest.Curr Cardiol Rev. 2018;14(2):102-108. doi: 10.2174/1573403X14666180507164443. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2018. PMID: 29737257 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical