Cost-effectiveness of defibrillator therapy or amiodarone in chronic stable heart failure: results from the Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial (SCD-HeFT)
- PMID: 16818817
- DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.581884
Cost-effectiveness of defibrillator therapy or amiodarone in chronic stable heart failure: results from the Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial (SCD-HeFT)
Abstract
Background: In the Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial (SCD-HeFT), implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy significantly reduced all-cause mortality rates compared with medical therapy alone in patients with stable, moderately symptomatic heart failure, whereas amiodarone had no benefit on mortality rates. We examined long-term economic implications of these results.
Methods and results: Medical costs were estimated by using hospital billing data and the Medicare Fee Schedule. Our base case cost-effectiveness analysis used empirical clinical and cost data to estimate the lifetime incremental cost of saving an extra life-year with ICD therapy relative to medical therapy alone. At 5 years, the amiodarone arm had a survival rate equivalent to that of the placebo arm and higher costs than the placebo arm. For ICD relative to medical therapy alone, the base case lifetime cost-effectiveness and cost-utility ratios (discounted at 3%) were dollar 38,389 per life-year saved (LYS) and dollar 41,530 per quality-adjusted LYS, respectively. A cost-effectiveness ratio < dollar 100,000 was obtained in 99% of 1000 bootstrap repetitions. The cost-effectiveness ratio was sensitive to the amount of extrapolation beyond the empirical 5-year trial data: dollar 127,503 per LYS at 5 years, dollar 88,657 per LYS at 8 years, and dollar 58,510 per LYS at 12 years. Because of a significant interaction between ICD treatment and New York Heart Association class, the cost-effectiveness ratio was dollar 29,872 per LYS for class II, whereas there was incremental cost but no incremental benefit in class III.
Conclusions: Prophylactic use of single-lead, shock-only ICD therapy is economically attractive in patients with stable, moderately symptomatic heart failure with an ejection fraction < or = 35%, particularly those in NYHA class II, as long as the benefits of ICD therapy observed in the SCD-HeFT persist for at least 8 years.
Comment in
-
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for primary prevention of sudden death in heart failure: are there enough bangs for the bucks?Circulation. 2006 Jul 11;114(2):101-3. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.637405. Circulation. 2006. PMID: 16831996 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Cost-effectiveness of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 6;353(14):1471-80. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa051989. N Engl J Med. 2005. PMID: 16207849
-
The long-term cost-effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.Eur Heart J. 2007 Jan;28(1):42-51. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl382. Epub 2006 Nov 16. Eur Heart J. 2007. PMID: 17110403
-
Cost-effectiveness of implantable cardioverter defibrillators in patients >or=65 years of age.Am Heart J. 2010 Jul;160(1):122-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.04.021. Am Heart J. 2010. PMID: 20598982
-
Arrhythmia risk stratification with regard to prophylactic implantable defibrillator therapy in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Results of MACAS, DEFINITE, and SCD-HeFT.Herz. 2004 May;29(3):348-52. doi: 10.1007/s00059-004-2578-0. Herz. 2004. PMID: 15167963 Review.
-
Indications for ICD and cardiac resynchronization therapy for prevention of sudden cardiac death.Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2009 Feb;7(2):181-95. doi: 10.1586/14779072.7.2.181. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2009. PMID: 19210214 Review.
Cited by
-
Current status of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in heart failure.Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2009 Sep;6(3):199-209. doi: 10.1007/s11897-009-0028-2. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2009. PMID: 19723462 Review.
-
Priorities for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research: A Report of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Centers for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Working Group.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017 Jul;10(7):e001967. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.001967. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017. PMID: 28710296 Free PMC article.
-
Economic evaluations of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a systematic review.Eur J Health Econ. 2015 Nov;16(8):879-93. doi: 10.1007/s10198-014-0637-x. Epub 2014 Oct 17. Eur J Health Econ. 2015. PMID: 25323413
-
The transition to value-based care.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2016 Oct;47(1):61-68. doi: 10.1007/s10840-016-0166-x. Epub 2016 Jul 21. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2016. PMID: 27444638 Review.
-
Association of single- vs dual-chamber ICDs with mortality, readmissions, and complications among patients receiving an ICD for primary prevention.JAMA. 2013 May 15;309(19):2025-34. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.4982. JAMA. 2013. PMID: 23677314 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical