Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2006 Aug 7;95(3):385-9.
doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603260. Epub 2006 Jul 4.

Oral contraceptive use and cancer. Findings in a large cohort study, 1968-2004

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Oral contraceptive use and cancer. Findings in a large cohort study, 1968-2004

M Vessey et al. Br J Cancer. .

Abstract

We examined cancer incidence in relation to oral contraceptive (OC) use in the Oxford Family Planning Association contraceptive study. The study includes 17032 women, recruited at family planning clinics at ages 25-39 years between 1968 and 1974, who were using OCs, a diaphragm, or an intrauterine device. Follow-up data were available until 2004. OC use was not significantly related to nonreproductive cancer. Breast cancer findings (844 cases) likewise were very reassuring (rate ratio (RR) comparing women ever using OCs with those never doing so 1.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.8-1.1). There was a strong positive relationship between cervical cancer incidence (59 cases) and duration of OC use (RR comparing users for 97+ months with nonusers 6.1, 95%CI, 2.5-17.9). Uterine body cancer (77 cases) and ovarian cancer (106 cases) showed strong negative associations with duration of OC use: RRs for 97+ months of use were 0.1 (95%CI, 0.0-0.4) and 0.3 (95%CI, 0.1-0.5) respectively. This apparent protective effect for both cancers persisted more than 20 years after stopping OCs. Combining data for cancers of the cervix, uterine body and ovary, the age adjusted RR for women ever using OCs compared with those never doing so was 0.7 (95%CI, 0.5-0.8). Beneficial effects of OCs on the gynaecological cancers thus outweighed adverse effects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Breslow NE, Day NE (1987) Statistical Methods in Cancer Research, Volume II. The Design and Analysis of Cohort studies. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer - PubMed
    1. Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer (1996) Breast cancer and hormonal contraceptives: collaborative reanalysis of individual data on 53297 women with breast cancer and 100239 women without breast cancer from 54 epidemiological studies. Lancet 347: 1713–1727 - PubMed
    1. Cogliano V, Grosse Y, Baan R, Straif K, Secretan B (2005) El Ghissassi Carcinogenicity of combined oestrogen-progestogen contraceptives and menopausal treatment. Lancet Oncol 6: 552–553 - PubMed
    1. Deligeoroglou E, Michailidis E, Creatsas G (2003) Oral contraceptives and reproductive system cancer. Ann NY Acad Sci 997: 199–208 - PubMed
    1. Hannaford PC, Villard-Mackintosh L, Vessey MP, Kay CR (1991) Oral contraceptives and malignant melanoma. Br J Cancer 63: 430–433 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances