Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2007 Feb;17(2):321-9.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-006-0332-0. Epub 2006 Jul 4.

The accuracy of 1- and 3-mm slices in coronary calcium scoring using multi-slice CT in vitro and in vivo

Affiliations
Comparative Study

The accuracy of 1- and 3-mm slices in coronary calcium scoring using multi-slice CT in vitro and in vivo

Georg Mühlenbruch et al. Eur Radiol. 2007 Feb.

Abstract

The accuracy of coronary calcium scoring using 16-row MSCT comparing 1- and 3-mm slices was assessed. A thorax phantom with calcium cylinder inserts was scanned applying a non-enhanced retrospectively ECG-gated examination protocol: collimation 12 x 0.75 mm; 120 kV; 133 mAs(eff). Thirty-eight patients were examined using the same scan protocol. Image reconstruction was performed with an effective slice thickness of 3 and 1 mm. The volume score, calcium mass and Agatston score were determined. Image noise was measured in both studies. The volume score and calcium mass varied less than the Agatston score. The overall measured calcium mass compared to the actual calcium mass revealed a relative difference of +2.0% for 1-mm slices and -1.2% for 3-mm slices. Due to increased image noise in thinner slices in the patient study (26.1 HU), overall calcium scoring with a scoring threshold of 130 HU was not feasible. Interlesion comparison showed significantly higher scoring results for thinner slices (all P<0.001). A similar accuracy comparing calcium scoring results of 1- and 3-mm slices was shown in the phantom study; therefore, the potentially necessary increase of the patient's dose in order to achieve assessable 1-mm slices with an acceptable image-to-noise-ratio appears not to be justified.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Br Heart J. 1974 May;36(5):499-506 - PubMed
    1. Invest Radiol. 2002 Sep;37(9):496-502 - PubMed
    1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001 May;176(5):1295-8 - PubMed
    1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 Aug;181(2):533-8 - PubMed
    1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990 Mar 15;15(4):827-32 - PubMed

Publication types