Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Jul 4:3:6.
doi: 10.1186/1742-7622-3-6.

Regression analysis with categorized regression calibrated exposure: some interesting findings

Affiliations

Regression analysis with categorized regression calibrated exposure: some interesting findings

Ingvild Dalen et al. Emerg Themes Epidemiol. .

Abstract

Background: Regression calibration as a method for handling measurement error is becoming increasingly well-known and used in epidemiologic research. However, the standard version of the method is not appropriate for exposure analyzed on a categorical (e.g. quintile) scale, an approach commonly used in epidemiologic studies. A tempting solution could then be to use the predicted continuous exposure obtained through the regression calibration method and treat it as an approximation to the true exposure, that is, include the categorized calibrated exposure in the main regression analysis.

Methods: We use semi-analytical calculations and simulations to evaluate the performance of the proposed approach compared to the naive approach of not correcting for measurement error, in situations where analyses are performed on quintile scale and when incorporating the original scale into the categorical variables, respectively. We also present analyses of real data, containing measures of folate intake and depression, from the Norwegian Women and Cancer study (NOWAC).

Results: In cases where extra information is available through replicated measurements and not validation data, regression calibration does not maintain important qualities of the true exposure distribution, thus estimates of variance and percentiles can be severely biased. We show that the outlined approach maintains much, in some cases all, of the misclassification found in the observed exposure. For that reason, regression analysis with the corrected variable included on a categorical scale is still biased. In some cases the corrected estimates are analytically equal to those obtained by the naive approach. Regression calibration is however vastly superior to the naive method when applying the medians of each category in the analysis.

Conclusion: Regression calibration in its most well-known form is not appropriate for measurement error correction when the exposure is analyzed on a percentile scale. Relating back to the original scale of the exposure solves the problem. The conclusion regards all regression models.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fuller W. Measurement Error Models Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics: Probability and Mathematical Statistics. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc; 1987.
    1. Carroll R, Ruppert D, Stefanski L. Measurement Error in Nonlinear Models. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability, Chapman and Hall; 1995.
    1. Rosner B, Willett W, Spiegelman D. Correction of Logistic Regression Relative Risk Estimates and Confidence Intervals for Systematic Within-Person Measurement Error. Statistics in Medicine. 1989;8:1051–1070. - PubMed
    1. Rosner B, Spiegelman D, Willett W. Correction of Logistic Regression Relative Risk Estimates and Confidence Intervals for Measurement Error: The Case of Multiple Covariates Measured with Error. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1990;132:734–745. - PubMed
    1. Carroll R, Stefanski L. Approximate Quasilikelihood Estimation in Models with Surrogate Predictors. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1990;85:652–663. doi: 10.2307/2290000. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources