Regression analysis with categorized regression calibrated exposure: some interesting findings
- PMID: 16820052
- PMCID: PMC1559617
- DOI: 10.1186/1742-7622-3-6
Regression analysis with categorized regression calibrated exposure: some interesting findings
Abstract
Background: Regression calibration as a method for handling measurement error is becoming increasingly well-known and used in epidemiologic research. However, the standard version of the method is not appropriate for exposure analyzed on a categorical (e.g. quintile) scale, an approach commonly used in epidemiologic studies. A tempting solution could then be to use the predicted continuous exposure obtained through the regression calibration method and treat it as an approximation to the true exposure, that is, include the categorized calibrated exposure in the main regression analysis.
Methods: We use semi-analytical calculations and simulations to evaluate the performance of the proposed approach compared to the naive approach of not correcting for measurement error, in situations where analyses are performed on quintile scale and when incorporating the original scale into the categorical variables, respectively. We also present analyses of real data, containing measures of folate intake and depression, from the Norwegian Women and Cancer study (NOWAC).
Results: In cases where extra information is available through replicated measurements and not validation data, regression calibration does not maintain important qualities of the true exposure distribution, thus estimates of variance and percentiles can be severely biased. We show that the outlined approach maintains much, in some cases all, of the misclassification found in the observed exposure. For that reason, regression analysis with the corrected variable included on a categorical scale is still biased. In some cases the corrected estimates are analytically equal to those obtained by the naive approach. Regression calibration is however vastly superior to the naive method when applying the medians of each category in the analysis.
Conclusion: Regression calibration in its most well-known form is not appropriate for measurement error correction when the exposure is analyzed on a percentile scale. Relating back to the original scale of the exposure solves the problem. The conclusion regards all regression models.
Similar articles
-
Regression calibration for classical exposure measurement error in environmental epidemiology studies using multiple local surrogate exposures.Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Aug 1;172(3):344-52. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq123. Epub 2010 Jun 23. Am J Epidemiol. 2010. PMID: 20573838
-
Correction for misclassification of a categorized exposure in binary regression using replication data.Stat Med. 2009 Nov 30;28(27):3386-410. doi: 10.1002/sim.3712. Stat Med. 2009. PMID: 19757445
-
Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2012 May;(167):5-83; discussion 85-91. Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2012. PMID: 22838153
-
Correcting for the bias caused by exposure measurement error in epidemiological studies.Respirology. 2014 Oct;19(7):979-84. doi: 10.1111/resp.12356. Epub 2014 Aug 14. Respirology. 2014. PMID: 25123473 Review.
-
Incorporating Measurement Error from Modeled Air Pollution Exposures into Epidemiological Analyses.Curr Environ Health Rep. 2017 Dec;4(4):472-480. doi: 10.1007/s40572-017-0160-1. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2017. PMID: 28983855 Review.
Cited by
-
Bias Correction Methods for Misclassified Covariates in the Cox Model: comparison offive correction methods by simulation and data analysis.J Stat Theory Pract. 2013 Jan 1;7(2):381-400. doi: 10.1080/15598608.2013.772830. J Stat Theory Pract. 2013. PMID: 24072991 Free PMC article.
-
STRATOS guidance document on measurement error and misclassification of variables in observational epidemiology: Part 2-More complex methods of adjustment and advanced topics.Stat Med. 2020 Jul 20;39(16):2232-2263. doi: 10.1002/sim.8531. Epub 2020 Apr 3. Stat Med. 2020. PMID: 32246531 Free PMC article.
-
Misclassification simulation extrapolation method for a Weibull accelerated failure time model.Stat Methods Med Res. 2023 Aug;32(8):1478-1493. doi: 10.1177/09622802231168248. Epub 2023 Apr 25. Stat Methods Med Res. 2023. PMID: 37122155 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Fuller W. Measurement Error Models Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics: Probability and Mathematical Statistics. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc; 1987.
-
- Carroll R, Ruppert D, Stefanski L. Measurement Error in Nonlinear Models. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability, Chapman and Hall; 1995.
-
- Rosner B, Willett W, Spiegelman D. Correction of Logistic Regression Relative Risk Estimates and Confidence Intervals for Systematic Within-Person Measurement Error. Statistics in Medicine. 1989;8:1051–1070. - PubMed
-
- Rosner B, Spiegelman D, Willett W. Correction of Logistic Regression Relative Risk Estimates and Confidence Intervals for Measurement Error: The Case of Multiple Covariates Measured with Error. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1990;132:734–745. - PubMed
-
- Carroll R, Stefanski L. Approximate Quasilikelihood Estimation in Models with Surrogate Predictors. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1990;85:652–663. doi: 10.2307/2290000. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources