Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Mar;20(1):53-66.
doi: 10.1007/s10278-005-6976-5.

Contrast enhancement in dense breast images to aid clustered microcalcifications detection

Affiliations

Contrast enhancement in dense breast images to aid clustered microcalcifications detection

Fátima L S Nunes et al. J Digit Imaging. 2007 Mar.

Abstract

This paper presents a method to provide contrast enhancement in dense breast digitized images, which are difficult cases in testing of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) schemes. Three techniques were developed, and data from each method were combined to provide a better result in relation to detection of clustered microcalcifications. Results obtained during the tests indicated that, by combining all the developed techniques, it is possible to improve the performance of a processing scheme designed to detect microcalcification clusters. It also allows operators to distinguish some of these structures in low-contrast images, which were not detected via conventional processing before the contrast enhancement. This investigation shows the possibility of improving CAD schemes for better detection of microcalcifications in dense breast images.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Scheme showing the resulting energy after attenuation in parts of the breast with and without microcalcification.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Fluxogram for redistributing the gray levels in the ACE technique.
Fig 3
Fig 3
Scheme representing the procedure FPR.
Fig 4
Fig 4
Graphics comparing the detections in original images and in images enhanced by the HTE technique: (a) percentage of true-positive detections, (b) percentage of false-positive detections.
Fig 5
Fig 5
Graphics comparing the detections in original images and in images enhanced by the ACE technique: (a) percentage of true-positive detections, (b) percentage of false-positive detections.
Fig 6
Fig 6
Graphics comparing the detections in original images and in images enhanced by the CCE technique: (a) percentage of true-positive detections, (b) percentage of false-positive detections.
Fig 7
Fig 7
ROC curves relative to the techniques HTE, ACE, and CCE, applied individually to the images set.
Fig 8
Fig 8
Graphic showing the effect of the FPR procedure on the processed images.
Fig 9
Fig 9
Diagram corresponding to the final configuration for the processing scheme intended to detect clustered microcalcifications in dense breast images.
Fig 10
Fig 10
ROC curve relative to the final configuration of the CAD scheme for the first images set.
Fig 11
Fig 11
Example of processing of the first images set with the final scheme configuration: (a) original image, (b) image after CCE, (c) image b after ACE, (d) image b after HTE, (e) image c after segmentation, (f) image d after segmentation, (g) image resulting from the union between e and f, (h) image g after APT, (i) image h after FPR, (j) resulting image after cluster detection.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Giger ML. Computer-aided diagnosis of breast lesions in medical images. Comput Sci Eng. 2000;2(5):39–45. doi: 10.1109/5992.877391. - DOI
    1. Giger ML, MacMahon H. Image processing and computer-aided diagnosis. Radiol Clin North Am. 1996;34(3):565–595. - PubMed
    1. LeGal M, Chavanne G, Pellier D. Valeur diagnostique des microcalcifications groupées découvertes par mammographies. Bull Cancer. 1984;71:57–64. - PubMed
    1. Nishikawa RM, Jiang Y, Giger ML, Schimdt RA, Vyborny CJ, Zhang W, Papaionnou J, Bick U, Nagel R, Doi K, et al. Performance of automated CAD schemes for the detection and classification of clustered microcalcifications. In: Gale AG, et al., editors. Digital Mammography. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1994. pp. 13–20.
    1. Roerih J, et al.: Clinical results with R2 imagechecker system. In: Karssemeijer N, et al. (Eds). Digital Mammography. Kluwer Academic Publishing, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1998, pp 395–400

Publication types