[Reproducibility of Fuhrman nuclear grade: advantages of a two-grade system]
- PMID: 16821337
[Reproducibility of Fuhrman nuclear grade: advantages of a two-grade system]
Abstract
The Fuhrman nuclear grade is the reference histoprognostic grading system routinely used all over the world for renal cell carcinoma. Studies measuring the inter-observer and intra-observer concordance of Fuhrman grade show poor results in terms of reproducibility and repeatability. These variations are due to a certain degree of subjectivity of the pathologist in application of the definition of tumour grade, particularly nuclear grade. Elements able to account for this subjectivity in renal cell carcinoma are identified from a review of the literature. To improve the reliability of nuclear grade, the territory occupied by the highest grade must be specified and the grades should probably be combined. At the present time, regrouping of grade 1 and 2 tumours as low grade and grade 3 and 4 tumours as high grade would achieve better reproducibility, while preserving the prognostic: value for overall survival. The development of new treatment modalities and their use in adjuvant situations will imply the use of reliable histoprognostic factors to specify, indications.
Similar articles
-
Original and reviewed nuclear grading according to the Fuhrman system: a multivariate analysis of 388 patients with conventional renal cell carcinoma.Cancer. 2005 Jan 1;103(1):68-75. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20749. Cancer. 2005. PMID: 15573369
-
Multicenter determination of optimal interobserver agreement using the Fuhrman grading system for renal cell carcinoma: Assessment of 241 patients with > 15-year follow-up.Cancer. 2005 Feb 1;103(3):625-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20812. Cancer. 2005. PMID: 15611969
-
The chromophobe tumor grading system is the preferred grading scheme for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.J Urol. 2011 Dec;186(6):2168-74. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.07.068. Epub 2011 Oct 19. J Urol. 2011. PMID: 22014797
-
Grading systems in renal cell carcinoma.J Urol. 2007 Feb;177(2):430-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.09.034. J Urol. 2007. PMID: 17222604 Review.
-
Outcome prediction for renal cell carcinoma: evaluation of prognostic factors for tumours divided according to histological subtype.Pathology. 2007 Oct;39(5):459-65. doi: 10.1080/00313020701570061. Pathology. 2007. PMID: 17886093 Review.
Cited by
-
Intraobserver and interobserver variability of Fuhrman and modified Fuhrman grading systems for conventional renal cell carcinoma.Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2009 Nov;25(11):596-600. doi: 10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70562-5. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2009. PMID: 19858038 Free PMC article.
-
Preoperative Predicting the WHO/ISUP Nuclear Grade of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma by Computed Tomography-Based Radiomics Features.J Pers Med. 2020 Dec 23;11(1):8. doi: 10.3390/jpm11010008. J Pers Med. 2020. PMID: 33374569 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical