Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Aug 7;273(1596):1881-6.
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3527.

Reduced mortality selects for family cohesion in a social species

Affiliations

Reduced mortality selects for family cohesion in a social species

Michael Griesser et al. Proc Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Delayed dispersal is the key to family formation in most kin-societies. Previous explanations for the evolution of families have focused on dispersal constraints. Recently, an alternative explanation was proposed, emphasizing the benefits gained through philopatry. Empirical data have confirmed that parents provide their philopatric offspring with preferential treatment through enhanced access to food and predator protection. Yet it remains unclear to what extent such benefits translate into fitness benefits such as reduced mortality, which ultimately can select for the evolution of families. Here, we demonstrate that philopatric Siberian jay (Perisoreus infaustus) offspring have an odds ratio of being killed by predators 62% lower than offspring that dispersed promptly after independence to join groups of unrelated individuals (20.6% versus 33.3% winter mortality). Predation was the sole cause of mortality, killing 20 out of 73 juveniles fitted with radio tags. The higher survival rate among philopatric offspring was associated with parents providing nepotistic predator protection that was withheld from unrelated group members. Natal philopatry usually involves the suppression of personal reproduction. However, a lower mortality of philopatric offspring can overcome this cost and may thus select for the formation of families and set the scene for cooperative kin-societies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Rate of aggressive encounters of all other group members towards philopatric offspring (black) and immigrants (grey; ±s.e.). Philopatric offspring were only chased by other juveniles. Kinship: GLMM, χ12=31.46, p<0.0001 (analysing the sum of displacements and chases).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Time spent foraging either alone (more than 50 m from closest group member) or together with other groups members (less than 50 m from closest group member) for philopatric offspring (black) and immigrants (grey; kinship, GLMM, χ12=9.02, p=0.002).

References

    1. Baglione V, Canestrari D, Marcos J.M, Ekman J. Experimentally increased food resources in the natal territory promote offspring philopatry and helping in cooperatively breeding carrion crows. Proc. R. Soc. B. 2006;273:1529–1536. 10.1098/rspb.2006.3481 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brown J.L. Princeton University Press; Princeton, NJ: 1987. Helping and communal breeding in birds: ecology and evolution.
    1. Clutton-Brock T. Breeding together: kin selection and mutualism in cooperative vertebrates. Science. 2002;296:69–72. 10.1126/science.296.5565.69 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dickinson J.L, Hatchwell B.J. Fitness consequences of helping. In: Koenig W.D, Dickinson J.L, editors. Ecology and evolution of cooperative breeding in bird. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: 2004. pp. 48–66.
    1. Dickinson J.L, McGowan A. Winter resource wealth drives delayed dispersal and family-group living in western bluebirds. Proc. R. Soc. B. 2005;272:2423–2428. 10.1098/rspb.2005.3269 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types