Influence of surgical manipulation on prostate gene expression: implications for molecular correlates of treatment effects and disease prognosis
- PMID: 16822846
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.1458
Influence of surgical manipulation on prostate gene expression: implications for molecular correlates of treatment effects and disease prognosis
Erratum in
- J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jun 1;25(16):2334. Huang, Chung Y [added]
Abstract
Purpose: Measurements of tissue gene expression are increasingly used for disease stratification, clinical trial eligibility, and assessment of neoadjuvant therapy response. However, the method of tissue acquisition alone could significantly influence the expression of specific transcripts or proteins. This study examines whether there are transcript alterations associated with surgical resection of the prostate gland by radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Materials and methods: Twelve patients with clinically localized prostate cancer underwent immediate in situ prostate biopsy after induction of anesthesia for radical prostatectomy. Ex vivo prostate biopsies were performed immediately after surgical removal. Prostate epithelium was acquired by laser-capture microdissection, and transcript abundance levels were quantitated by cDNA microarray hybridization and confirmed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Data were analyzed by paired, two-sample t test using Statistical Analysis of Microarray algorithms, and linear models were fit as a function of clinical characteristics.
Results: Of 5,753 cDNAs with measurable expression in prostate epithelium, 88 (1.5%) were altered as a result of surgery (false-discovery rate < or = 10%), representing 62 unique genes. These included transcripts encoding acute phase response proteins, IER2 and JUNB, and regulators of cell proliferation, p21Cip1 and KLF6. Of the clinical characteristics examined, including patient age, prostate volume, serum prostate-specific antigen, blood loss, and operative time, only gland volume was significantly and negatively associated with the magnitude of gene expression difference between pre- and postsurgical specimens.
Conclusion: Surgical manipulation results in significant gene expression changes. Molecular analyses of surgical samples should recognize that transcript alterations occur rapidly, and these results are important when designing and analyzing molecular correlates of clinical studies.
Comment in
-
Noise and bias in microarray analysis of tumor specimens.J Clin Oncol. 2006 Aug 10;24(23):3719-21. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.7942. Epub 2006 Jul 5. J Clin Oncol. 2006. PMID: 16822841 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Molecular alterations in prostate carcinomas that associate with in vivo exposure to chemotherapy: identification of a cytoprotective mechanism involving growth differentiation factor 15.Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Oct 1;13(19):5825-33. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1037. Clin Cancer Res. 2007. PMID: 17908975 Clinical Trial.
-
Low-fat, low-glycemic load diet and gene expression in human prostate epithelium: a feasibility study of using cDNA microarrays to assess the response to dietary intervention in target tissues.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007 Oct;16(10):2150-4. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0154. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007. PMID: 17932364 Clinical Trial.
-
Marked gene transcript level alterations occur early during radical prostatectomy.Eur Urol. 2008 Feb;53(2):333-44. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.03.075. Epub 2007 Apr 9. Eur Urol. 2008. PMID: 17448597
-
Use of laser capture microdissection, cDNA microarrays, and tissue microarrays in advancing our understanding of prostate cancer.J Pathol. 2001 Sep;195(1):80-6. doi: 10.1002/path.892. J Pathol. 2001. PMID: 11568894 Review.
-
[Molecular analysis for prostate cancer].Nihon Rinsho. 2005 Feb;63(2):213-7. Nihon Rinsho. 2005. PMID: 15714968 Review. Japanese.
Cited by
-
Differential gene expression in benign prostate epithelium of men with and without prostate cancer: evidence for a prostate cancer field effect.Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Nov 15;16(22):5414-23. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-0272. Epub 2010 Oct 8. Clin Cancer Res. 2010. PMID: 20935156 Free PMC article.
-
Gene expression in normal-appearing tissue adjacent to prostate cancers are predictive of clinical outcome: evidence for a biologically meaningful field effect.Oncotarget. 2016 Jun 7;7(23):33855-65. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8944. Oncotarget. 2016. PMID: 27121323 Free PMC article.
-
Quantitative RT-PCR gene expression analysis of laser microdissected tissue samples.Nat Protoc. 2009;4(6):902-22. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2009.61. Epub 2009 May 21. Nat Protoc. 2009. PMID: 19478806 Free PMC article.
-
Surgical Tumor Resection Deregulates Hallmarks of Cancer in Resected Tissue and the Surrounding Microenvironment.Mol Cancer Res. 2024 Jun 4;22(6):572-584. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-23-0265. Mol Cancer Res. 2024. PMID: 38394149 Free PMC article.
-
Controlling technical variation amongst 6693 patient microarrays of the randomized MINDACT trial.Commun Biol. 2020 Jul 27;3(1):397. doi: 10.1038/s42003-020-1111-1. Commun Biol. 2020. PMID: 32719399 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Molecular Biology Databases
Miscellaneous