Reduction of prolonged postoperative hospital stay after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal carcinoma
- PMID: 16823650
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-005-0651-2
Reduction of prolonged postoperative hospital stay after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal carcinoma
Abstract
Background: In evaluating the quality of laparoscopic surgery (LS) for colorectal carcinoma, many previous reports have used median or range values to assess the length of postoperative hospital stay and to show the complication and conversion rates separately. However, with this method, it is impossible to assess the proportion of patients who required prolonged postoperative hospital stay because of perioperative morbidities. This study investigated the proportion of patients who benefited from LS as minimally invasive surgery by assessing the percentage of patients who required prolonged postoperative hospital stay because of major perioperative morbidities.
Methods: A review of 202 patients who underwent LS for colorectal carcinoma at the authors' hospital between January 2002 and December 2004 was performed. Short-term outcomes were compared among the patients who underwent LS in 2002, 2003, and 2004.
Results: No significant differences were observed in baseline characteristics among the groups, and all the procedures in this study were completed laparoscopically. There were no significant differences in the operative times and intraoperative blood losses among the groups. Most of the patients resumed liquid intake on postoperative day 1 and solid food on day 3. However, there was a significant difference in the rate of postoperative prolonged hospital stays by year of surgery. In 2004, 97.3% of the patients (72/74) undergoing LS could be discharged to home within 8 days postoperatively. Major complications occurred at a low rate of 1.4% (1/74) in 2004. Regarding the reasons for prolonged postoperative hospital stay, inappropriate judgment of the physician in charge, based primarily on requests from patients without medical necessity, disappeared in 2004.
Conclusions: When LS is performed properly by specialists who have accumulated sufficient experience in both LS and conventional open surgery for colorectal carcinoma, up to 97% of patients undergoing LS can benefit from minimally invasive surgery.
Similar articles
-
Laparoscopic versus conventional palliative resection for incurable, symptomatic stage IV colorectal cancer: impact on short-term results.Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011 Jun;21(3):184-7. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31821db75e. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011. PMID: 21654303
-
[Introduction of laparoscopic splenectomy for the treatment of immune thrombocytopenic purpura].Zentralbl Chir. 2004 Apr;129(2):108-13. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-818730. Zentralbl Chir. 2004. PMID: 15106041 German.
-
Hand-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery: Practice patterns and clinical outcomes in a minimally-invasive colorectal practice.Surg Endosc. 2008 Mar;22(3):739-43. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9477-4. Surg Endosc. 2008. PMID: 17704883
-
Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome.Ann Surg. 2002 Dec;236(6):759-66; disscussion 767. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000036269.60340.AE. Ann Surg. 2002. PMID: 12454514 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection.Surg Endosc. 2004 Mar;18(3):427-32. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-9267-y. Epub 2004 Feb 2. Surg Endosc. 2004. PMID: 14752626 Review.
Cited by
-
Wound infection after a laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer.Surg Today. 2008;38(7):618-22. doi: 10.1007/s00595-007-3684-4. Epub 2008 Jul 9. Surg Today. 2008. PMID: 18612786 Review.
-
The impact of complications on prolonged length of hospital stay after resection in colorectal cancer: A retrospective study of Taiwanese patients.J Int Med Res. 2017 Apr;45(2):691-705. doi: 10.1177/0300060516684087. Epub 2017 Feb 7. J Int Med Res. 2017. PMID: 28173723 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical