Long-term results of mycophenolate mofetil as part of immunosuppressive induction therapy after liver transplantation
- PMID: 16824141
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2005.00485.x
Long-term results of mycophenolate mofetil as part of immunosuppressive induction therapy after liver transplantation
Abstract
Background: The addition of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to the induction protocol resulted in a lower incidence of rejection episodes. However, the question whether MMF should be administered in combination with tacrolimus or cyclosporine has not been answered yet. In our study, we report on the long-term results of triple induction therapy after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), consisting of MMF and low-dose corticosteroids, in combination with either tacrolimus or cyclosporine.
Methods: Between March 1996 and April 1997, 120 consecutive patients, who underwent OLT at our institution, were enrolled in this study. Of these patients, 80 received triple induction therapy consisting of cyclosporine and MMF (40) or tacrolimus and MMF (40), in combination with low-dose corticosteroids, whereas the remaining 40 patients served as 'MMF-free' control group receiving dual induction therapy with tacrolimus and corticosteroids. Besides the eight-yr follow-up of patient and graft survival, clinical data were also reviewed for episodes of rejection and infection. Additionally, the early post-operative pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid (MPA, immunological active metabolite of MMF) were evaluated.
Results: Long-term results provided higher patient and graft survival after tacrolimus/MMF-based induction therapy than after cyclosporine/MMF-based induction therapy. However, the tacrolimus-based control protocol yielded similar results and, therefore, no significantly superior effect was observed when MMF was added. The same observation was made for incidence of rejection and infection episodes. AUC and C(max) of MPA increased in combination with tacrolimus compared with cyclosporine.
Conclusions: Although pharmacological synergy between tacrolimus and MMF was observed, MMF showed no significant beneficial effects in the immunosuppressive induction protocol, neither in combination with tacrolimus nor with cyclosporine.
Similar articles
-
Four-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial of mycophenolate mofetil with cyclosporine microemulsion or tacrolimus following liver transplantation.Clin Transplant. 2004 Aug;18(4):463-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2004.00192.x. Clin Transplant. 2004. PMID: 15233827 Clinical Trial.
-
Ten-year results of a randomized trial comparing tacrolimus versus cyclosporine a in combination with mycophenolate mofetil after heart transplantation.Transplantation. 2013 Feb 27;95(4):629-34. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e318277e378. Transplantation. 2013. PMID: 23423270 Clinical Trial.
-
A randomized long-term trial of tacrolimus and sirolimus versus tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporine (NEORAL) and sirolimus in renal transplantation. I. Drug interactions and rejection at one year.Transplantation. 2004 Jan 27;77(2):244-51. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000101290.20629.DC. Transplantation. 2004. PMID: 14742989 Clinical Trial.
-
Conversion from cyclosporine-based immunosuppression to tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil in patients with refractory and ongoing acute renal allograft rejection.Ann Transplant. 2006;11(2):51-6. Ann Transplant. 2006. PMID: 17494290 Review.
-
Immunosuppressive drugs in paediatric liver transplantation.Paediatr Drugs. 2001;3(1):43-60. doi: 10.2165/00128072-200103010-00004. Paediatr Drugs. 2001. PMID: 11220404 Review.
Cited by
-
Antibody induction versus corticosteroid induction for liver transplant recipients.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 31;2014(5):CD010252. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010252.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. PMID: 24880007 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous