Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Jul 6:6:30.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-30.

The demise of the randomised controlled trial: bibliometric study of the German-language health care literature, 1948 to 2004

Daniel Galandi  1 , Guido Schwarzer, Gerd Antes
Affiliations

The demise of the randomised controlled trial: bibliometric study of the German-language health care literature, 1948 to 2004

Daniel Galandi et al. BMC Med Res Methodol. .

Abstract

Background: In order to reduce systematic errors (such as language bias) and increase the precision of the summary treatment effect estimate, a comprehensive identification of randomised controlled trials (RCT), irrespective of publication language, is crucial in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. We identified trials in the German general health care literature.

Methods: Eight German language general health care journals were searched for randomised controlled trials and analysed with respect to the number of published RCTs each year and the size of trials.

Results: A total of 1618 trials were identified with a median total number of 43 patients per trial. Between 1970 and 2004 a small but constant rise in sample size from a median number of 30 to 60 patients per trial can be observed. The number of published trials was very low between 1948 and 1970, but increased between 1970 and 1986 to a maximum of 11.2 RCTs per journal and year. In the following time period a striking decline of the number of RCTs was observed. Between 1999 and 2001 only 0.8 RCTs per journal and year were published, in the next three years, the number of published trials increased to 1.7 RCTs per journal and year.

Conclusion: German language general health care journals no longer have a role in the dissemination of trial results. The slight rise in the number of published RCTs in the last three years can be explained by a change of publication language from German to English of three of the analysed journals.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Number and Size of RCTs published in eight German language general health care journals.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Egger M, Zellweger-Zähner T, Schneider M, Junker C, Lengeler C, Antes G. Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German. Lancet. 1997;350:326–9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)02419-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Juni P, Holenstein F, Sterne J, Bartlett C, Egger M. Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31:115–23. doi: 10.1093/ije/31.1.115. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pham B, Klassen TP, Lawson ML, Moher D. Language of publication restrictions in systematic reviews gave different results depending on wether the intervention was conventional or complementary. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:769–76. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.08.021. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moher D, Pham B, Klassen TP, Schulz KF, Berlin JA, Jadad AR, Liberati A. What contributions do languages other than English make on the results of meta-analyses? J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53:964–72. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00188-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McDonald S, Westby M, Clarke M, Lefebvre C, Cochrane Centres' Working Group on 50 Years of Randomized Trials Number and size of randomized trials reported in general health care journals from 1948 to 1997. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31:125–7. doi: 10.1093/ije/31.1.125. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources