Temporal dynamics of auditory and visual bistability reveal common principles of perceptual organization
- PMID: 16824924
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.05.054
Temporal dynamics of auditory and visual bistability reveal common principles of perceptual organization
Abstract
When dealing with natural scenes, sensory systems have to process an often messy and ambiguous flow of information. A stable perceptual organization nevertheless has to be achieved in order to guide behavior. The neural mechanisms involved can be highlighted by intrinsically ambiguous situations. In such cases, bistable perception occurs: distinct interpretations of the unchanging stimulus alternate spontaneously in the mind of the observer. Bistable stimuli have been used extensively for more than two centuries to study visual perception. Here we demonstrate that bistable perception also occurs in the auditory modality. We compared the temporal dynamics of percept alternations observed during auditory streaming with those observed for visual plaids and the susceptibilities of both modalities to volitional control. Strong similarities indicate that auditory and visual alternations share common principles of perceptual bistability. The absence of correlation across modalities for subject-specific biases, however, suggests that these common principles are implemented at least partly independently across sensory modalities. We propose that visual and auditory perceptual organization could rely on distributed but functionally similar neural competition mechanisms aimed at resolving sensory ambiguities.
Similar articles
-
Bistability for audiovisual stimuli: Perceptual decision is modality specific.J Vis. 2008 May 19;8(7):1.1-15. doi: 10.1167/8.7.1. J Vis. 2008. PMID: 19146234
-
Visual and auditory influence on perceptual stability in visual competition.Seeing Perceiving. 2011;24(6):545-64. doi: 10.1163/187847511X588809. Epub 2011 Sep 6. Seeing Perceiving. 2011. PMID: 21902880
-
Modality-specificity of sensory aging in vision and audition: evidence from event-related potentials.Brain Res. 2008 Jun 18;1215:53-68. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.02.010. Epub 2008 Feb 14. Brain Res. 2008. PMID: 18482717
-
Combining visual and auditory information.Prog Brain Res. 2006;155:243-58. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)55014-9. Prog Brain Res. 2006. PMID: 17027392 Review.
-
The role of predictive models in the formation of auditory streams.J Physiol Paris. 2006 Jul-Sep;100(1-3):154-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2006.09.012. Epub 2006 Nov 3. J Physiol Paris. 2006. PMID: 17084600 Review.
Cited by
-
Auditory streaming emerges from fast excitation and slow delayed inhibition.J Math Neurosci. 2021 May 3;11(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13408-021-00106-2. J Math Neurosci. 2021. PMID: 33939042 Free PMC article.
-
Auditory Stream Segregation Can Be Modeled by Neural Competition in Cochlear Implant Listeners.Front Comput Neurosci. 2019 Jul 3;13:42. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2019.00042. eCollection 2019. Front Comput Neurosci. 2019. PMID: 31333438 Free PMC article.
-
Bistable perception of ambiguous images: simple Arrhenius model.Cogn Neurodyn. 2019 Dec;13(6):613-621. doi: 10.1007/s11571-019-09554-9. Epub 2019 Sep 12. Cogn Neurodyn. 2019. PMID: 31741696 Free PMC article.
-
The role of spatiotemporal and spectral cues in segregating short sound events: evidence from auditory Ternus display.Exp Brain Res. 2014 Jan;232(1):273-82. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3738-3. Epub 2013 Oct 20. Exp Brain Res. 2014. PMID: 24141518
-
Dynamics of Competition between Subnetworks of Spiking Neuronal Networks in the Balanced State.PLoS One. 2015 Sep 25;10(9):e0138947. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138947. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26407178 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources