Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Jul-Aug;121(4):382-92.
doi: 10.1177/003335490612100406.

Patterns of intimate partner violence and their associations with physical health, psychological distress, and substance use

Affiliations

Patterns of intimate partner violence and their associations with physical health, psychological distress, and substance use

Kristin Carbone-López et al. Public Health Rep. 2006 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this work is to formally model patterns of intimate partner violence (IPV) separately for males and females and to assess the unique contributions of different types of violence exposure to health related outcomes.

Methods: Using data from the National Violence Against Women Survey--a national probability sample of U.S. men and women--latent class analyses produced a map of the underlying structure of IPV for both males and females that is defined by specific types of violent acts. Multivariable logistic regression analyses assessed the differential physical health, mental health, and substance use consequences of exposure to IPV by gender.

Results: Women and men experience similar types of IPV, although the prevalence of the different types of violence is much greater for women than men. Second, exposure to IPV for both women and men is associated with a range of negative health outcomes including increased odds of poor physical health and physical disability, psychological distress and mental illness, and heightened recreational and non-recreational substance use. Finally, there is some evidence that experiences with IPV have stronger and broader associations with negative health outcomes among women, likely reflecting differences in the severity of violence experienced by men and women.

Conclusions: More attention to the ways in which interpersonal violence is conceptualized, measured, and screened for is crucial. Specifically, while women have greater exposure to IPV, and subsequently a greater range of health problems, the effects on men should not be ignored.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Crowell NA, Burgess AW, editors. Understanding violence against women. Washington: National Academy Press; 1996.
    1. Kruttschnitt C, McLaughlin BL, Petrie CV, editors. Advancing the federal research agenda on violence against women. Washington: National Research Council, National Academies Press; 2004.
    1. Coker AL, Davis KE, Arias I, Desai S, Sanderson M, Brandt HM, Smith PH. Physical and mental health effects of intimate partner violence for men and women. Am J Prev Med. 2002;23:260–8. - PubMed
    1. Danielson KK, Moffitt TE, Caspi A, Silva PA. Comorbidity between abuse of an adult and DSM-III-R mental disorders: evidence from an epidemiological study. Am J Psychiatry. 1998;155:131–3. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moffitt TE, Caspi A. Findings about partner violence from the Dunedin multidisciplinary health and development study. Research in brief. Washington: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice; 1999.

Publication types