Effect of medical therapy on survival of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy

Abstract

Few studies have been conducted that focus on survival as the end point of medical therapy of CHF. No vigorous studies have been conducted in dogs. It is generally accepted that diuretic therapy is an essential component of the therapy of CHF in cardiomyopathic dogs. Significant symptomatic improvement is afforded by diuretics, and acute death may be prevented. In this context diuretics can be said to improve survival. However, diuretics do not alter the natural progression of cardiomyopathy and in this context do not favorably influence long-term survival. Digitalis glycosides have been shown in humans to improve various parameters of CHF in a subset of patients with either atrial fibrillation or third heart sounds. In dogs, these gallop heart rhythms due to third heart sounds are usually associated with myocardial failure due to dilated cardiomyopathy. In spite of symptomatic improvement, no study has demonstrated an unequivocal favorable effect of digoxin on survival of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Likewise, there is no convincing evidence of an adverse effect on survival. Newer, powerful inotropes, such as milrinone, often demonstrate impressive short-term improvements in left ventricular function, clinical signs, and exercise tolerance in patients with CHF. However, their long-term benefits are much less impressive, they are arrhythmogenic, and they have not been shown to prolong survival. In fact, long-term milrinone therapy in humans has had an unfavorable influence on mortality. Vasodilators offer the potential advantage of increasing left ventricular performance without an associated increase in myocardial oxygen demand and cardiac rhythm disturbances. The only vigorous survival study that unequivocally demonstrated improved survival of patients with advanced CHF due to myocardial failure, including dilated cardiomyopathy, was the Consensus Trial. Survival of patients receiving enalapril was significantly better than those receiving placebo. In fact, the trial was stopped prematurely by the ethical review committee when it became obvious that the results favored the enalapril group. Although the use of beta-adrenergic blocking drugs in cardiomyopathic patients with CHF is controversial and associated with a risk of short-term deterioration of left ventricular function, their use in human medicine is gaining acceptance. Although hemodynamic and clinical evidence of improvement has been demonstrated along with withdrawal-associated deterioration, the only study purporting a beneficial effect on survival used retrospective controls.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)