Use of icodextrin 4% solution in the prevention of adhesion formation following general surgery: from the multicentre ARIEL Registry
- PMID: 16834859
- PMCID: PMC1964633
- DOI: 10.1308/003588406X114730
Use of icodextrin 4% solution in the prevention of adhesion formation following general surgery: from the multicentre ARIEL Registry
Abstract
Introduction: Intra-abdominal adhesions occur in many patients following major abdominal surgery and represent a serious burden to patients and healthcare providers. The multicentre ARIEL (Adept Registry for Clinical Evaluation) Registry was established to gather clinical experiences in the use of icodextrin 4% solution, an approved adhesion-reduction agent, during routine general surgery.
Patients and methods: General surgeons from five European countries completed anonymised data collection forms for patients undergoing laparotomy or laparoscopy. Surgeons recorded patient demographics, use of icodextrin 4% solution and adverse events, and made subjective assessments of ease of use and patient acceptability with the agent.
Results: The general surgery registry included 1738 patients (1469 laparotomies, 269 laparoscopies). Leakage of fluid from the surgical site did not appear to be affected by icodextrin 4% solution and was classified as 'normal' or 'less than normal' in most patients (laparotomies 86%, laparoscopies 88%). Overall, satisfaction with ease of use was rated as 'good' or 'excellent' by the majority of surgeons (laparotomies 77%, laparoscopies 86%). Patient acceptability was also good, with ratings of 'as expected' or 'less than expected' in most cases for both abdominal distension (laparotomies 90%, laparoscopies 91%) and abdominal discomfort (laparotomies 91%, laparoscopies 93%). Adverse events occurred in 30.6% of laparotomy patients and 16.7% of laparoscopy patients; the most common events were septic/infective events (4.2% and 3.4% in the laparotomy and laparoscopy groups, respectively). Anastomotic wound-healing problems were reported in 7.6% of patients in the subset of laparoscopy patients undergoing anastomotic procedures (n = 66).
Discussion: Volumes of icodextrin 4% solution used as an irrigant and instillate were in line with recommendations. Surgeons considered the agent to be easy to use and acceptable to patients. The reported frequencies of adverse events were in line with those published in the literature for surgical procedures, supporting the good safety profile of this agent.
Conclusions: Icodextrin 4% solution can be used in a wide range of surgical procedures. In combination with good surgical technique, it may play an important role in adhesion reduction.
Similar articles
-
Gynaecological endoscopic evaluation of 4% icodextrin solution: a European, multicentre, double-blind, randomized study of the efficacy and safety in the reduction of de novo adhesions after laparoscopic gynaecological surgery.Hum Reprod. 2011 Aug;26(8):2015-27. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der135. Epub 2011 Jun 1. Hum Reprod. 2011. PMID: 21632697 Clinical Trial.
-
P.O.P.A. study: prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by icodextrin 4% solution after laparotomy for adhesive small bowel obstruction. A prospective randomized controlled trial.J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Feb;16(2):382-8. doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1736-y. Epub 2011 Nov 4. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012. PMID: 22052104 Clinical Trial.
-
Role of icodextrin in the prevention of small bowel obstruction. Safety randomized patients control of the first 300 in the ADEPT trial.Colorectal Dis. 2016 Mar;18(3):295-300. doi: 10.1111/codi.13095. Colorectal Dis. 2016. PMID: 26934850 Clinical Trial.
-
Intra-abdominal adhesion formation: does surgical approach matter? Questionnaire survey of South Asian surgeons and literature review.J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2011 Oct;37(10):1382-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2011.01543.x. Epub 2011 May 22. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2011. PMID: 21599803 Review.
-
Adhesions: pathogenesis and prevention-panel discussion and summary.Eur J Surg Suppl. 1997;(577):56-62. Eur J Surg Suppl. 1997. PMID: 9076453 Review.
Cited by
-
Intra-abdominal adhesions: definition, origin, significance in surgical practice, and treatment options.Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010 Nov;107(44):769-75. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0769. Epub 2010 Nov 5. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010. PMID: 21116396 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Bologna Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction (ASBO): 2010 Evidence-Based Guidelines of the World Society of Emergency Surgery.World J Emerg Surg. 2011 Jan 21;6:5. doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-6-5. World J Emerg Surg. 2011. PMID: 21255429 Free PMC article.
-
Use of methylene blue in the prevention of recurrent intra-abdominal postoperative adhesions.J Int Med Res. 2018 Jan;46(1):504-510. doi: 10.1177/0300060517727694. Epub 2017 Aug 31. J Int Med Res. 2018. PMID: 29325513 Free PMC article.
-
Polymers in the prevention of peritoneal adhesions.Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2008 Jan;68(1):57-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2007.03.027. Epub 2007 Jul 20. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2008. PMID: 17881201 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Adhesion-preventing properties of 4% icodextrin and canola oil: a comparative experimental study.Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2012 Nov;67(11):1303-8. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2012(11)14. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2012. PMID: 23184208 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ellis H. The clinical significance of adhesions: focus on intestinal obstruction. Eur J Surg. 1997;163(Suppl 577):5–9. - PubMed
-
- Becker JM, Dayton MT, Fazio VW, Beck DE, Stryker SJ, Wexner SD, et al. Prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by a sodium hyaluronate-based bioresorbable membrane: a prospective, randomized, double-blind multi-center study. J Am Coll Surg. 1996;183:297–306. - PubMed
-
- Risberg B. Adhesions: preventive strategies. Eur J Surg. 1997;163(Suppl 577):32–9. - PubMed
-
- diZerega GS. Biochemical events in peritoneal tissue repair. Eur J Surg. 1997;163(Suppl 577):10–6. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical