Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2006 Aug;15 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S354-60.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0176-y. Epub 2006 Jul 12.

Mechanical concepts for disc regeneration

Affiliations
Review

Mechanical concepts for disc regeneration

Klaus John Schnake et al. Eur Spine J. 2006 Aug.

Abstract

Different strategies exist to treat intervertebral disc degeneration. Biological attempts to regenerate the disc are promising. However, degeneration of the disc is always accompanied by alterations of disc height, intradiscal pressure, load distribution, and motion patterns, respectively. Since those preconditions are independent factors for disc degeneration, it is unlikely that regeneration may occur without firstly restoring the physiological status of the affected spinal segment. In vitro and in vivo animal studies demonstrate that disc distraction normalizes intradiscal height and pressure. Furthermore, histological and radiological examinations provided some evidence for regenerative processes in the disc. Only dynamic stabilization systems currently offer the potential of a mechanical approach to intervertebral disc regeneration. Dynamic stabilization systems either using pedicle screws or with an interspinous device, demonstrate restabilization of spinal segments and reduction of intradiscal pressure. Clinical reports of patients with degenerative disc disease who underwent dynamic stabilization are promising. However, there is no evidence that those implants will lead to disc regeneration. Future treatment concepts should combine intradiscal cell based therapy together with dynamic restoration of the affected spinal segment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adams MA, McNally DS, Dolan P. Stress distributions inside intervertebral discs. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1996;78–B:965–972. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X78B6.1287. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ala-Kokko L. Genetic risk factors for lumbar disc disease. Ann Med. 2002;34:42–47. doi: 10.1080/078538902317338634. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Battie MC, Videman T, Parent E. Lumbar disc degeneration: epidemiology and genetic influences. Spine. 2004;29:2679–2690. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000146457.83240.eb. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boos N, Weissbach S, Rohrbach H, Weiler C, Spratt KF, Nerlich AG. Classification of age-related changes in lumbar intervertebral discs: 2002 Volvo Award in basic science. Spine. 2002;27:2631–2644. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200212010-00002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brechbuhler D, Markwalder TM, Braun M. Surgical results after soft system stabilization of the lumbar spine in degenerative disc disease—long-term results. Acta Neurochir. 1998;140:521–525. doi: 10.1007/s007010050135. - DOI - PubMed