Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2007 Mar;16(3):321-8.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0142-8. Epub 2006 Jul 12.

Transforaminal steroid injections for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy: a prospective and randomised study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Transforaminal steroid injections for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy: a prospective and randomised study

Leif Anderberg et al. Eur Spine J. 2007 Mar.

Abstract

Steroid injections are often employed as an alternative treatment for radicular pain in patients with degenerative spinal disorders. Prospective randomised studies of the lumbar spine reveal contradictory results and non-randomised and most often retrospective studies of the cervical spine indicate pain reduction from steroid injections. No prospective randomised study on transforaminal steroid injections for the treatment of radicular pain in the cervical spine focusing on short-term results has been performed. Forty consecutive patients were employed for the study. The inclusion criteria were one-sided cervical radiculopathy with radicular distribution of arm pain distal to the elbow and corresponding significant degenerative pathology of the cervical spine at one or two levels on the same side as the radicular pain and visualised by MRI. A transforaminal technique was used for all injections. A positive response to a diagnostic selective nerve root block at one or two nerve roots was mandatory for all patients. The patients were randomised for treatment with steroids/local anaesthetics or saline/local anaesthetic. Only the neuroradiologist performing the blocks was aware of the content of the injection; all other persons involved in the study were blinded. Follow up was made 3 weeks after the randomised treatment by a clinical investigation and with a questionnaire focusing on the subjective effects from the injections. At follow up, there were no differences in treatment results in the two patient groups. Statistical analysis of the results confirmed the lack of difference in treatment effect. Further studies have to be performed before excluding steroids in such treatment and for evaluating the influence of local anaesthetics on radiculopathy in transforaminal injections.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Akkerveeken PF. The diagnostic value of nerve root sheath infiltration. Acta Orthop. 1993;64(Suppl. 251):61–63. doi: 10.3109/17453679309160120. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderberg L, Annertz M, Brandt L, Säveland H. Selective diagnostic cervical nerve root blocks: correlation with clinical symptoms and MRI-pathology. Acta Neurochir. 2004;146(6):559–565. doi: 10.1007/s00701-004-0241-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baker R, Dreyfuss P, Mercer S, Bogduk N. Cervical transforaminal injection of corticosteroids into a radicular artery: a possible mechanism for spinal cord injury. Pain. 2003;103(1–2):211–215. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(02)00343-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barnsley L, Lord SM, Wallis BJ, Bogduk N. Lack of effect of intraarticular corticosteroids for chronic pain in the cervical zygapophyseal joints. N Engl J Med. 1994;330(15):1083–1084. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199404143301504. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Basal S, Turtle MJ. Inadvertent subdural spread complicating epidural steroid injection with local anaesthetic agent. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2003;31(5):570–572. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances