[Infected knee arthroplasty. A treatment algorithm at the Kantonsspital Liestal, Switzerland]
- PMID: 16835763
- DOI: 10.1007/s00132-006-0978-y
[Infected knee arthroplasty. A treatment algorithm at the Kantonsspital Liestal, Switzerland]
Abstract
The algorithm differentiates between several surgical treatment options depending on the duration of the infection, on the amount of soft tissue damage, on the stability of the implant and the type of micro-organism. If the symptoms of infection exist for less then 3 weeks, a radical debridement is indicated under the condition of a stable implant and good soft tissue conditions. A one-stage exchange is possible with satisfactory conditions of soft tissue and the absence of difficult-to-treat, resistant micro-organisms. In patients with sinustracts or compromised soft tissue, a two-stage exchange is necessary. The placement of a spacer combined with a short interval of 2-3 weeks until reimplantation is possible for easy-to-treat bacteria. For difficult-to-treat micro-organisms, an interval of 8 weeks without spacer until reimplantation is necessary. While stabilised by a fixateur extern, antimicrobial treatment is administered for the first 6 weeks. If the tissue specimens at reimplantation two weeks later do not show growth of bacteria or signs of acute inflammation, antimicrobial treatment can be discontinued. For all other above-mentioned treatment protocols, we administer antimicrobial treatment for a total of 6 months. We present the results of 40 consecutive infected total knee arthroplasties treated according to our algorithm, including a detailed presentation of the two-stage revision procedure.
Similar articles
-
[Treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty. When does implant salvage make sense?].Orthopade. 2006 Sep;35(9):929-30, 932-6. doi: 10.1007/s00132-006-0985-z. Orthopade. 2006. PMID: 16810533 Review. German.
-
[Arthrodesis after total knee arthroplasty considering septic loosening as an example].Orthopade. 2006 Sep;35(9):946, 948-52, 954-5. doi: 10.1007/s00132-006-0980-4. Orthopade. 2006. PMID: 16819617 Review. German.
-
[Periprosthetic knee infection. One-stage exchange].Orthopade. 2006 Sep;35(9):937-8, 940-5. doi: 10.1007/s00132-006-0979-x. Orthopade. 2006. PMID: 16810534 Review. German.
-
[Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty].Orthopade. 2006 Feb;35(2):184-91. doi: 10.1007/s00132-005-0910-x. Orthopade. 2006. PMID: 16369847 Review. German.
-
[Periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty].Orthopade. 2006 Sep;35(9):961-70, 972-4. doi: 10.1007/s00132-006-0990-2. Orthopade. 2006. PMID: 16841213 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Diagnostic work-up strategy for periprosthetic joint infections after total hip and knee arthroplasty: a 12-year experience on 320 consecutive cases.Patient Saf Surg. 2015 May 16;9:20. doi: 10.1186/s13037-015-0071-8. eCollection 2015. Patient Saf Surg. 2015. PMID: 25987902 Free PMC article.
-
[Knee joint infections].Unfallchirurg. 2013 Mar;116(3):255-68; quiz 269-70. doi: 10.1007/s00113-012-2325-6. Unfallchirurg. 2013. PMID: 23478901 German.
-
Periprosthetic Joint Infections of the Knee-Comparison of Different Treatment Algorithms.J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 26;13(13):3718. doi: 10.3390/jcm13133718. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38999284 Free PMC article.
-
[Association between allergy to benzoyl peroxide, vitiligo and implantation of a cemented total knee joint prosthesis: Is there a connection?].Orthopade. 2011 Sep;40(9):802-6. doi: 10.1007/s00132-011-1793-7. Orthopade. 2011. PMID: 21678087 German.
-
[What can be done when hip prostheses fail? : New trends in revision endoprosthetics].Orthopade. 2011 Dec;40(12):1084-94. doi: 10.1007/s00132-011-1844-0. Orthopade. 2011. PMID: 22109589 Review. German.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical