Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Nov;21(11):1138-43.
doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00551.x. Epub 2006 Jul 7.

Prevalence and determinants of physician bedside rationing: data from Europe

Samia A Hurst  1 , Anne-Marie Slowther, Reidun Forde, Renzo Pegoraro, Stella Reiter-Theil, Arnaud Perrier, Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer, Marion Danis
Affiliations

Prevalence and determinants of physician bedside rationing: data from Europe

Samia A Hurst et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Bedside rationing by physicians is controversial. The debate, however, is clouded by lack of information regarding the extent and character of bedside rationing.

Design, setting, and participants: We developed a survey instrument to examine the frequency, criteria, and strategies used for bedside rationing. Content validity was assessed through expert assessment and scales were tested for internal consistency. The questionnaire was translated and administered to General Internists in Norway, Switzerland, Italy, and the United Kingdom. Logistic regression was used to identify the variables associated with reported rationing.

Results: Survey respondents (N=656, response rate 43%) ranged in age from 28 to 82, and averaged 25 years in practice. Most respondents (82.3%) showed some degree of agreement with rationing, and 56.3% reported that they did ration interventions. The most frequently mentioned criteria for rationing were a small expected benefit (82.3%), low chances of success (79.8%), an intervention intended to prolong life when quality of life is low (70.6%), and a patient over 85 years of age (70%). The frequency of rationing by clinicians was positively correlated with perceived scarcity of resources (odds ratio [OR]=1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06 to 1.16), perceived pressure to ration (OR=2.14, 95% CI 1.52 to 3.01), and agreement with rationing (OR=1.13, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.23).

Conclusion: Bedside rationing is prevalent in all surveyed European countries and varies with physician attitudes and resource availability. The prevalence of physician bedside rationing, which presents physicians with difficult moral dilemmas, highlights the importance of discussions regarding how to ration care in the most ethically justifiable manner.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Percentage of physicians reporting rationing in the prior 6 months. Percentages shown exclusive of missing data.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Strategies used to limit expensive interventions. Percentages shown exclusive of missing data.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

  • Tough questions, even harder answers.
    Ubel PA. Ubel PA. J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Nov;21(11):1209-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00617.x. J Gen Intern Med. 2006. PMID: 17026736 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Asch DA, Ubel PA. Rationing by any other name. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:1668–71. - PubMed
    1. Relman A. Use of medical resources—overview. Prev Med. 1990;19:688–92. - PubMed
    1. Bloche MG, Jungman ER. The “R” word. J Contemp Health Law Policy. 2002;18:633–9. - PubMed
    1. Coulter A, Ham C. The Global Challenge of Health Care Rationing. Buckingham: Open University Press; 2000.
    1. Sulmasy DP. Physicians, cost control, and ethics. Ann Intern Med. 1992;116:920–6. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms