Nasal continuous positive airway pressure from high flow cannula versus Infant Flow for Preterm infants
- PMID: 16837929
- DOI: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211561
Nasal continuous positive airway pressure from high flow cannula versus Infant Flow for Preterm infants
Abstract
Objective: To compare the feasibility of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) support generated by high flow nasal cannula with conventional CPAP for prevention of reintubation among preterm infants with a birth weight of <or=1,250 g.
Study design: Preterm infants were randomized to CPAP generated via high flow cannula or the Infant Flow Nasal CPAP System (VIASYS, Conshohocken, PA, USA) at extubation. Primary outcome was incidence of reintubation within 7 days. Secondary outcomes included change in oxygen use and frequency of apnea and bradycardias postextubation.
Results: Forty neonates were randomized. Twelve of 20 infants randomized to high flow cannula CPAP were reintubated compared to three of 20 using Infant Flow (P=0.003). The high flow cannula group had increased oxygen use and more apneas and bradycardias postextubation.
Conclusions: CPAP delivered by high flow nasal cannula failed to maintain extubation status among preterm infants <or=1,250 g as effectively as Infant Flow CPAP.
Similar articles
-
A randomized controlled trial of post-extubation bubble continuous positive airway pressure versus Infant Flow Driver continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome.J Pediatr. 2009 May;154(5):645-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.12.034. Epub 2009 Feb 23. J Pediatr. 2009. PMID: 19230906 Clinical Trial.
-
Randomised crossover trial of four nasal respiratory support systems for apnoea of prematurity in very low birthweight infants.Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2009 Jul;94(4):F245-8. doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.148981. Epub 2009 Jan 8. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2009. PMID: 19131432 Clinical Trial.
-
Delivery room continuous positive airway pressure/positive end-expiratory pressure in extremely low birth weight infants: a feasibility trial.Pediatrics. 2004 Sep;114(3):651-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0394. Pediatrics. 2004. PMID: 15342835 Clinical Trial.
-
High flow nasal cannula therapy as respiratory support in the preterm infant.Pediatr Pulmonol. 2009 Jul;44(7):629-34. doi: 10.1002/ppul.21051. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2009. PMID: 19499590 Review.
-
Post-extubation prophylactic nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants: systematic review and meta-analysis.J Paediatr Child Health. 1999 Aug;35(4):367-71. J Paediatr Child Health. 1999. PMID: 10457294
Cited by
-
Work of breathing indices in infants with respiratory insufficiency receiving high-flow nasal cannula and nasal continuous positive airway pressure.J Perinatol. 2014 Jan;34(1):27-32. doi: 10.1038/jp.2013.120. Epub 2013 Sep 26. J Perinatol. 2014. PMID: 24071905 Free PMC article.
-
Infant flow biphasic nasal continuous positive airway pressure (BP- NCPAP) vs. infant flow NCPAP for the facilitation of extubation in infants' ≤ 1,250 grams: a randomized controlled trial.BMC Pediatr. 2012 Apr 4;12:43. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-12-43. BMC Pediatr. 2012. PMID: 22475409 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
High-flow Nasal Cannulae in Very Preterm Infants after Extubation.J Clin Neonatol. 2014 Jan;3(1):11-3. doi: 10.4103/2249-4847.128719. J Clin Neonatol. 2014. PMID: 24741533 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
High flow nasal cannula in extubated patients: is it advantageous over conventional oxygen therapy?J Thorac Dis. 2016 Dec;8(12):3494-3495. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.12.105. J Thorac Dis. 2016. PMID: 28149541 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
High Flow Nasal Cannulae versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Neonates with Respiratory Distress Syndrome Managed with INSURE Method: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Iran J Med Sci. 2016 Nov;41(6):494-500. Iran J Med Sci. 2016. PMID: 27853329 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical