[Necessity of increasing autopsy frequency following the introduction of DRGs]

Abstract

With the introduction of DRGs (diagnosis related groups) in 2004, a new charging system was initiated in Germany. Changes primarily involve lump sum based charging of inpatient cases regardless of the duration or complexity of diagnostic procedures and therapy, and the equalization of costs for similar services. Calculation of DRGs also includes the costs of autopsy. This has three major consequences for autopsy practice: Quality assurance: continuous monitoring of professional quality under lump sum payment can only be permanently guaranteed and independently and reliably attained by autopsy. This is the only way to overcome the danger of abolishing essential diagnostic procedures because of economic pressure and thus risking incorrect diagnoses. Economy: additional diagnoses revealed by autopsy will, in many cases, raise calculated charges. This could have a significant financial impact. Legal certainty: autopsies increase the accuracy and objectivity of diagnoses. Thus, they protect the attending physician from incorrect charging which may be unintended but could be legally relevant, especially when the cause of death is unclear. For these reasons, autopsy should become more important in clinical routine.