A randomized, open-label, multicenter comparative study of the efficacy and safety of piperacillin-tazobactam and cefepime for the empirical treatment of febrile neutropenic episodes in patients with hematologic malignancies
- PMID: 16838234
- DOI: 10.1086/505393
A randomized, open-label, multicenter comparative study of the efficacy and safety of piperacillin-tazobactam and cefepime for the empirical treatment of febrile neutropenic episodes in patients with hematologic malignancies
Abstract
Background: The empirical treatment of febrile, neutropenic patients with cancer requires antibacterial regimens active against both gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens. This study was performed to demonstrate the noninferiority of monotherapy with piperacillin-tazobactam, compared with cefepime.
Methods: We conducted a randomized-controlled, open-label, multicenter clinical trial among high-risk patients from 34 university-affiliated tertiary care medical centers in the United States, Canada, and Australia who were undergoing treatment for leukemia or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and were hospitalized for empirical treatment of febrile neutropenic episodes. Patients received piperacillin-tazobactam (4.5 g every 6 h) or cefepime (2 g every 8 h) intravenously. The primary outcome was success (defined by defervescence without treatment modification) at 72 h of treatment, end of treatment, and test of cure in the modified intent-to-treat analysis. Secondary outcomes included time to defervescence, microbiological efficacy, the additional use of glycopeptide antibiotics, emergence of resistant bacteria, and safety.
Results: For 528 subjects (265 received piperacillin-tazobactam and 263 received cefepime), success rates were 57.7% and 48.3%, respectively (P = .04) at the 72-h time point, 39.6% and 31.6% (P = .06) at end of treatment, and 26.8% and 20.5% (P = .11) at the test-of-cure visit. The analyses demonstrated noninferiority for piperacillin-tazobactam at all time points (P< or = .0001). Treatment with piperacillin-tazobactam was independently associated with treatment success in multivariate analysis (odds ratio, 1.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-2.64; P = .035). Both regimens were well tolerated.
Conclusions: This study demonstrates the noninferiority and safety of piperacillin-tazobactam monotherapy, compared with cefepime, for the empirical treatment of high-risk febrile neutropenic patients with cancer.
Similar articles
-
Monotherapy with piperacillin/tazobactam versus cefepime as empirical therapy for febrile neutropenia in pediatric cancer patients: a randomized comparison.Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2006 Apr-May;23(3):177-86. doi: 10.1080/08880010500506370. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2006. PMID: 16517534 Clinical Trial.
-
Cefepime plus amikacin versus piperacillin-tazobactam plus amikacin for initial antibiotic therapy in haematology patients with febrile neutropenia: results of an open, randomized, multicentre trial.J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002 Jul;50(1):79-88. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkf087. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002. PMID: 12096010 Clinical Trial.
-
Piperacillin/tazobactam versus cefepime for the empirical treatment of pediatric cancer patients with neutropenia and fever: a randomized and open-label study.Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2009 Oct;53(4):610-4. doi: 10.1002/pbc.22100. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2009. PMID: 19484759 Clinical Trial.
-
Piperacillin/tazobactam: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in moderate to severe bacterial infections.Pharmacoeconomics. 2001;19(11):1135-75. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200119110-00006. Pharmacoeconomics. 2001. PMID: 11735679 Review.
-
[Treatment of febrile neutropenia episodes in children, with a piperacillin-tazobactam and netilmicin combination].Med Mal Infect. 2005 Jun;35(6):357-62. doi: 10.1016/j.medmal.2005.04.004. Med Mal Infect. 2005. PMID: 15982848 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Prophylaxis, diagnosis and therapy of infections in patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. 2020 update of the recommendations of the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO).Ann Hematol. 2021 Feb;100(2):321-336. doi: 10.1007/s00277-020-04297-8. Epub 2020 Oct 20. Ann Hematol. 2021. PMID: 33079221 Free PMC article. Review.
-
What Is the Optimal Induction Therapy for Younger Fit Patients With AML?Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2016 Oct;11(5):327-32. doi: 10.1007/s11899-016-0339-9. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2016. PMID: 27475430 Review.
-
Understanding oncologic emergencies and related emergency department visits and hospitalizations: a systematic review.BMC Emerg Med. 2025 Mar 5;25(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12873-025-01183-2. BMC Emerg Med. 2025. PMID: 40045233 Free PMC article.
-
Kidney failure related to broad-spectrum antibiotics in critically ill patients: secondary end point results from a 1200 patient randomised trial.BMJ Open. 2012 Mar 11;2(2):e000635. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000635. Print 2012. BMJ Open. 2012. PMID: 22411933 Free PMC article.
-
Prescribing Empiric Antibiotics for Febrile Neutropenia: Compliance with Institutional Febrile Neutropenia Guidelines.Pharmacy (Basel). 2018 Aug 10;6(3):83. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy6030083. Pharmacy (Basel). 2018. PMID: 30103459 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical