Evolutionary and physiological importance of hub proteins
- PMID: 16839197
- PMCID: PMC1500817
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020088
Evolutionary and physiological importance of hub proteins
Abstract
It has been claimed that proteins with more interaction partners (hubs) are both physiologically more important (i.e., less dispensable) and, owing to an assumed high density of binding sites, slow evolving. Not all analyses, however, support these results, probably because of biased and less-than reliable global protein interaction data. Here we provide the first examination of these issues using a comprehensive literature-curated dataset of well-substantiated protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Whereas use of less reliable yeast two-hybrid data alone can reject the possibility that local connectivity correlates with measures of dispensability, in higher quality datasets a relatively robust correlation is observed. In contrast, local connectivity does not correlate with the rate of protein evolution even in reliable datasets. This perhaps surprising lack of correlation with evolutionary rate appears in part to arise from the fact that hub proteins do not have a higher density of residues associated with binding. However, hub proteins do have at least one other set of unusual features, namely rapid turnover and regulation, as manifest in high mRNA decay rates and a large number of phosphorylation sites. This, we suggest, is an adaptation to minimize unwanted activation of pathways that might be mediated by adventitious binding to hubs, were they to actively persist longer than required at any given time point. We conclude that hub proteins are more important for cellular growth rate and under tight regulation but are not slow evolving.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures


Similar articles
-
Stratus not altocumulus: a new view of the yeast protein interaction network.PLoS Biol. 2006 Oct;4(10):e317. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040317. PLoS Biol. 2006. PMID: 16984220 Free PMC article.
-
Correlation of genomic features with dynamic modularity in the yeast interactome: a view from the structural perspective.IEEE Trans Nanobioscience. 2012 Sep;11(3):244-50. doi: 10.1109/TNB.2012.2212720. IEEE Trans Nanobioscience. 2012. PMID: 22987130
-
Evolutionary constraints on hub and non-hub proteins in human protein interaction network: insight from protein connectivity and intrinsic disorder.Gene. 2009 Apr 1;434(1-2):50-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2008.12.013. Epub 2008 Dec 29. Gene. 2009. PMID: 19185053
-
Explorations in topology-delving underneath the surface of genetic interaction maps.Mol Biosyst. 2009 Dec;5(12):1473-81. doi: 10.1039/b907076c. Epub 2009 Sep 8. Mol Biosyst. 2009. PMID: 19763324 Review.
-
The Cartographers toolbox: building bigger and better human protein interaction networks.Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic. 2009 Jan;8(1):1-11. doi: 10.1093/bfgp/elp003. Epub 2009 Mar 12. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic. 2009. PMID: 19282470 Review.
Cited by
-
Patterns of Fitness and Gene Expression Epistasis Generated by Beneficial Mutations in the rho and rpoB Genes of Escherichia coli during High-Temperature Adaptation.Mol Biol Evol. 2024 Sep 4;41(9):msae187. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msae187. Mol Biol Evol. 2024. PMID: 39235107 Free PMC article.
-
Open questions in the study of de novo genes: what, how and why.Nat Rev Genet. 2016 Sep;17(9):567-78. doi: 10.1038/nrg.2016.78. Epub 2016 Jul 25. Nat Rev Genet. 2016. PMID: 27452112 Review.
-
In search of the biological significance of modular structures in protein networks.PLoS Comput Biol. 2007 Jun;3(6):e107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030107. Epub 2007 Apr 30. PLoS Comput Biol. 2007. PMID: 17542644 Free PMC article.
-
Still stratus not altocumulus: further evidence against the date/party hub distinction.PLoS Biol. 2007 Jun;5(6):e154. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050154. PLoS Biol. 2007. PMID: 17564494 Free PMC article.
-
Identification of essential proteins based on a new combination of topological and biological features in weighted protein-protein interaction networks.IET Syst Biol. 2018 Dec;12(6):247-257. doi: 10.1049/iet-syb.2018.5024. IET Syst Biol. 2018. PMID: 30472688 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Han JDJ, Dupuy D, Bertin N, Cusick ME, Vidal M. Effect of sampling on topology predictions of protein–protein interaction networks. Nat Biotechnol. 2005;23:839–844. - PubMed
-
- Fraser HB, Hirsh AE, Steinmetz LM, Scharfe C, Feldman MW. Evolutionary rate in the protein-interaction network. Science. 2002;296:750–752. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases