Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Jul 14;2(7):e88.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020088. Epub 2006 Jun 5.

Evolutionary and physiological importance of hub proteins

Affiliations

Evolutionary and physiological importance of hub proteins

Nizar N Batada et al. PLoS Comput Biol. .

Abstract

It has been claimed that proteins with more interaction partners (hubs) are both physiologically more important (i.e., less dispensable) and, owing to an assumed high density of binding sites, slow evolving. Not all analyses, however, support these results, probably because of biased and less-than reliable global protein interaction data. Here we provide the first examination of these issues using a comprehensive literature-curated dataset of well-substantiated protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Whereas use of less reliable yeast two-hybrid data alone can reject the possibility that local connectivity correlates with measures of dispensability, in higher quality datasets a relatively robust correlation is observed. In contrast, local connectivity does not correlate with the rate of protein evolution even in reliable datasets. This perhaps surprising lack of correlation with evolutionary rate appears in part to arise from the fact that hub proteins do not have a higher density of residues associated with binding. However, hub proteins do have at least one other set of unusual features, namely rapid turnover and regulation, as manifest in high mRNA decay rates and a large number of phosphorylation sites. This, we suggest, is an adaptation to minimize unwanted activation of pathways that might be mediated by adventitious binding to hubs, were they to actively persist longer than required at any given time point. We conclude that hub proteins are more important for cellular growth rate and under tight regulation but are not slow evolving.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests. The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Relationship between Connectivity and Dispensability
Scatter plots of growth defect upon homozygous deletion of a gene and the natural log of connectivity of the gene in the interaction network. Growth rate data are from Steinmetz et al. [45].
Figure 2
Figure 2. Relationship between Connectivity and Evolutionary Rate
Scatter plots of natural log of connectivity and evolutionary rate of S. cerevisiae proteins. Shown here are the plots for singleton genes. For analysis of all genes and those with duplicates see Figures S1 and S2.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Han JDJ, Dupuy D, Bertin N, Cusick ME, Vidal M. Effect of sampling on topology predictions of protein–protein interaction networks. Nat Biotechnol. 2005;23:839–844. - PubMed
    1. Mintseris J, Weng Z. Structure, function, and evolution of transient and obligate protein–protein interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:10930–10935. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fraser HB, Wall DP, Hirsh AE. A simple dependence between protein evolution rate and the number of protein–protein interactions. BMC Evol Biol. 2003;3:11. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fraser HB, Hirsh AE, Steinmetz LM, Scharfe C, Feldman MW. Evolutionary rate in the protein-interaction network. Science. 2002;296:750–752. - PubMed
    1. Saeed R, Deane CM. Protein–protein interactions, evolutionary rate, abundance, and age. BMC Bioinformatics. 2006;7:128. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources