Examination of print and telephone channels for physical activity promotion: Rationale, design, and baseline data from Project STRIDE
- PMID: 16839823
- PMCID: PMC5718354
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2006.04.003
Examination of print and telephone channels for physical activity promotion: Rationale, design, and baseline data from Project STRIDE
Abstract
Background: Project STRIDE is a 4-year randomized controlled trial comparing two computer-based expert system guided intervention delivery channels (phone vs. print) for physical activity adoption and short-term maintenance among previously sedentary adults.
Methods: Sedentary adults (n=239) were randomized to one of the following (1) telephone-based, individualized motivationally-tailored feedback; (2) print-based, individualized motivationally-tailored feedback; (3) contact-control delayed treatment group (received intervention after 12 months as control). This paper: (1) outlines the study design, rationale, and participant sample; and (2) describes relationships between baseline variables to better understand their influence on the efficacy of the intervention.
Results: Participants averaged 19.8+/-25.0 min of physical activity/week that was at least of moderate intensity, with no group differences. The average estimated VO(2) at 85% of maximum heart rate was 25.6 ml/kg/min. Body fat was 34.1% for women and 23.2% for men and the BMI of the sample averaged 28.5 kg/m(2).
Conclusions: Project STRIDE examines non face-to-face approaches for promoting physical activity behavior. It has unique features including a direct comparison of an expert system guided intervention delivered via phone or print. Future analyses will examine the cost-effectiveness of the interventions and this will likely yield important information for policy-makers.
References
-
- Pate RR, Pratt M, Blair SN, et al. Physical activity and public health. A recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. JAMA. 1995;273:402–7. - PubMed
-
- Centers for Disease Control. Physical activity trends: United States, 1990–1998. MMWR. 2001;50:166–8. - PubMed
-
- Hu FB, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, et al. Physical activity and risk for stroke in women. JAMA. 2000;283:2961–7. - PubMed
-
- Bauman AE. Updating the evidence that physical activity is good for health: an epidemiological review 2000–2003. J Sci Med Sport. 2004;7:6–19. - PubMed
-
- King AC, Friedman R, Marcus B, et al. Harnessing motivational forces in the promotion of physical activity: the Community Health Advice by Telephone (CHAT) project. Health Educ Res. 2002;17:627–36. - PubMed
