A prospective and randomised study comparing the incidence of infusion phlebitis during continuous and cyclic peripheral parenteral nutrition
- PMID: 16839938
- DOI: 10.1016/0261-5614(91)90060-p
A prospective and randomised study comparing the incidence of infusion phlebitis during continuous and cyclic peripheral parenteral nutrition
Abstract
Phlebitis is a major obstacle to successful and prolonged peripheral parenteral nutrition (PPN). This study evaluated the effects of elective changes of the intravenous cannula and cyclic infusion of PPN on the incidence and the severity of phlebitis. 51 consecutive patients requiring PPN were randomised into three groups. Group 1 received PPN continuously through a line which was changed only on evidence of phlebitis. In Group 2 intravenous lines were changed every 24h. Group 3 patients received PPN as a 12-h infusion after which the intravenous cannula was withdrawn. All patients received 1800 non-protein calories and 9.4g nitrogen daily. Infusion sites were assessed daily for phlebitis and this was scored using a modified Maddox scale. The mean (range) duration of PPN was 7.5 (1-13), 10.0 (2-42) and 8.2 (3-14) days in the three groups respectively. Severe phlebitis occurred more frequently (p < 0.05) in Group 1 compared to Group 2 or Group 3. The overall incidence of phlebitis assessed from the mean value of the Maddox scores for each group was highest in Group 1 and was significantly greater than that observed in either Group 2 (p < 0.05) or Group 3 (p < 0.001). Group 3 patients who received cyclic PPN had the lowest incidence of phlebitis. The results of this study suggest that the incidence of infusion phlebitis is minimised during PPN by the cyclic infusion of nutrient solutions.
Similar articles
-
Prospective study of the aetiology of infusion phlebitis and line failure during peripheral parenteral nutrition.Br J Surg. 1996 Aug;83(8):1091-4. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800830817. Br J Surg. 1996. PMID: 8869311 Clinical Trial.
-
Peripheral parenteral nutrition: effect of a standardized compounded mixture on infusion phlebitis.Br J Surg. 1991 Nov;78(11):1391-4. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800781140. Br J Surg. 1991. PMID: 1760712 Clinical Trial.
-
Peripheral parenteral nutrition: An evaluation of its use, safety and cost implications in a tertiary hospital setting.Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2023 Aug;56:215-221. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2023.05.020. Epub 2023 Jun 5. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2023. PMID: 37344076
-
Peripheral parenteral nutrition in surgery - a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2023 Apr;54:337-348. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2023.02.004. Epub 2023 Feb 10. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2023. PMID: 36963880
-
Is there still a role for peripheral parenteral nutrition?Nutr Clin Pract. 2009 Dec;24(6):709-17. doi: 10.1177/0884533609351318. Nutr Clin Pract. 2009. PMID: 19955548 Review.
Cited by
-
Fine-bore cannulas for peripheral intravenous nutrition: polyurethane or silicone?Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1998 Mar;80(2):154-6. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1998. PMID: 9623385 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Routine care of peripheral intravenous catheters versus clinically indicated replacement: randomised controlled trial.BMJ. 2008 Jul 8;337(7662):a339. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a339. BMJ. 2008. PMID: 18614482 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Clinically-indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 23;1(1):CD007798. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007798.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 30671926 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical study on the ratio of glucose/fat in peripheral parenteral nutrition and the usage of a midline catheter.Surg Today. 1999;29(10):1040-6. doi: 10.1007/s005950050642. Surg Today. 1999. PMID: 10554328
-
Routine resite of peripheral intravenous devices every 3 days did not reduce complications compared with clinically indicated resite: a randomised controlled trial.BMC Med. 2010 Sep 10;8:53. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-53. BMC Med. 2010. PMID: 20831782 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources